成功老龄化量表跨文化调适及在城镇老年人中应用的信效度检验  

Cross-cultural adjustment of successful aging scale and its reliability and validity in urban elderly

作　　者：童佩 周静静[1] 郑雅婧 任青卓 梁韵仪 申乔乔 孙晓嘉[1] 高钰琳[1] Tong Pei;Zhou Jingjing;Zheng Yajing;Ren Qingzhuo;Liang Yunyi;Shen Qiaoqiao;Sun Xiaojia;Gao Yulin(School of Nursing,Southern Medical University,Guangzhou 510515,China)

机构地区：[1]南方医科大学护理学院,广州510515

出　　处：《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》2019年第11期1030-1036,共7页Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science

基　　金：全国老龄政策理论研究部级课题(QLB2018A028);广东省哲学社会科学“十三五”规划2016年度共建项目(GD16XGL35)。

摘　　要：目的对中国台湾版成功老龄化量表进行文化调适,并验证在中国大陆城镇老年人群中的信效度。方法对量表进行文化调适,经预试验修订后,形成正式调查问卷。釆用便利抽样方法抽取广州市600名城镇老年人面对面进行问卷调查,随机抽取300份样本进行探索性因子分析,余下的样本(n=300)验证量表的结构效度。结果探索性因子分析提取了健康自主、经济保障、生活适应、社会及亲友关系、学习、家庭6个因子,累计贡献率为65.366%。验证性因子分析的拟合指标为X2/df=1.861,CFI=0.930,IFI=0.930,TLI=0.923,GFI=0.823,RMSEA=0.054,RMR=0.073。健康自主、经济保障、生活适应以及家庭四个维度天花板效应显著。量表内部一致性Cronbach^s a系数为0.930,重测信度为0.943。成功老龄化量表条目均分23.95分被视为成功老龄化°结论成功老龄化量表具有良好的信效度,可用于测评我国大陆老年人成功老龄化水平及跟踪健康促进措施的有效性。Objective To revised the Taiwan version successful aging inventory(SAI),and verify its reliability and validity in urban elderly in China's Mainland.Methods SAI was adjusted by culture and revised by pre-test to form a formal questionnaire.A sample of 600 elderly people in Guangzhou was chosen for a face-to-face questionnaire survey through convenient sampling.Half of the sample(n=300)was randomly selected for exploratory factor analysis,and the other was used to confirm the structural validity of SAI.Results Exploratory factor analysis extracted six common factors,including health autonomy,economic se・curity,life adaptation,society and relative relationship,study and family.The cumulative contribution rate of six common factors was 65.366%.The fitting indexes of confirmatory factor analysis were X2/#=1.861,CFI=0.930,IFI=0.930,TLI=0.923,GFI=0.823,RMSEA=0.054,RMR=0.073.There were significant ceiling effects in the four dimensions of health autonomy,economic security,life adaptation,and family.The in・temal consistency coefficient(Cronbach's a)of SAI was 0.930,and the test-retest reliability was 0.943.An average score of SAI M 3.95 points was considered successful aging.Conclusion Reliability and validity of SAI are good,which can be used to measure the successful aging status of Chinese elders and track the effectiveness of health promotion measures.

关 键 词：成功老龄化 老年人 信度 效度 

分 类 号：R47[医药卫生—护理学]