检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张冉冉 陈永 黄列玉 ZHANG Ran-ran;CHEN Yong;HUANG Lie-yu(College of Medical Humanities,Guizhou Medical University,Guiyang,Guizhou 550025,China)
机构地区:[1]贵州医科大学医学人文学院
出 处:《教育教学论坛》2020年第1期87-89,共3页Education And Teaching Forum
基 金:2015年贵州省教育厅高等学校人文社会科学基地项目“以医护人员共情为中介的心理机制对医患关系的影响”(RT2015-2);2018年贵州医科大学人文社科理论创新课题“冲动性人格特质与同伴关系对大学生考试作弊行为的交互作用分析”(YJ2018-26)
摘 要:目标:考察同伴关系及性别差异对大学生考试作弊行为的影响,意在了解影响大学生考试作弊的行为机制。方法:设置两种考试情境(高他人作弊情境与低他人作弊情境)对520名大学生进行施测,收回有效问卷514份。结果:同伴关系的主效应显著F(1,501)=476.25,p<0.001;性别主效应显著F(1,501)=33.154,p<0.001;同伴关系与性别的交互作用显著F(1,501)=35.48,p<0.001。进一步简单效应分析结果表明:高他人作弊情境下,男生作弊意向显著高于女生F(1,501)=38.65,p<0.001;而低他人作弊情境下,男生与女生的作弊意向差异不显著F(1,501)=3.76,p=.053。结论:性别与同伴关系共同影响大学生考试作弊行为,男生风险寻求的特点使得他们在面临“损失”时比女生表现出更多的作弊倾向。Objective:in order to understand the behavioral mechanism of cheating examination among college students,the peer relationship and gender difference were adopted in this study.Methods:two examination situations which including high other cheating condition and low other cheating condition were set up to test 520 college students and recover 514 valid questionnaires.Results:showed that the main effect of peer relationship(F(1,501)=476.25,p<0.001)and gender(F(1,501)=33.154,p<0.001)were significant;as the same time,the interaction model was significant also F(1,501)=35.48,p<0.001;further analysis results showed that boys'cheating intention was higher than girls'in the high other cheating situation F(1,501)=38.65,p<0.001,but it can't be found in the low other cheating situation F(1,501)=3.76,p=.053.Conclusion:the gender and peer relations played a role in the cheating exam.When they faced with a"loss",boys showed more cheating than girls according the characteristics of boys'seeking risk.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7