合同无效时建设工程优先受偿权的教义学探析  

Priority of Construction Project under Invalid Contract

作　　者：王玮玲[1] WANG Weiling(Law School,Southeast University,Nanjing Jiangsu 211189,China)

机构地区：[1]东南大学法学院

出　　处：《法学论坛》2020年第1期97-105,共9页Legal Forum

基　　金：江苏省2017年社会科学基金项目《离婚财产分割的家庭建设功能研究》(17FXC009);中央高校基本科研业务费智库基地项目《“双一流”与“互联网+”双重背景下的高等教育立法研究》(2019S30032)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：由于对《合同法》第286条及相关司法解释的理解不同,司法实践中对合同无效时施工单位能否主张建设工程优先受偿权存在争议。作为对债权平等性的法定突破,建设工程优先受偿权必须具备充足的正当性基础;同时,出于对其他债权人利益衡平之考虑,必须严格限制可以优先受偿的债权的范围。合同无效体现了法律的否定性评价,相关司法解释不具有赋予特定情况下的无效施工合同以有效合同效果的正当性,因此产生的债权不应具有优先受偿之效力。Due to different understanding of Article 286 of the Contract Law and relevant judicial interpretation, it is controversial whether the constructor can claim priority of construction project when the contract is invalid in practice.as a legal breakthrough in the equality of creditor’s rights, priority of construction project must have a sufficient basis for legitimacy;at the same time, for the consideration of the interests of other creditors, the scope of claims that can be given priority must be strictly limited. Invalid contract reflects the negative evaluation of law, and the relevant judicial interpretation does not give invalid contract under certain circumstances the effect of effective contracts, so the resulting claims should not have the effect of priority compensation.

关 键 词：合同无效 优先受偿 正当性基础 折价补偿 

分 类 号：D913.6[政治法律—民商法学]