论摹状词理论的语用和句法之争  

On the Pragmatic and Syntactic Controversy about the Theory of Descriptions

作　　者：刘明亮 LIU Mingliang(Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 102488,China)

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院研究生院

出　　处：《重庆理工大学学报（社会科学）》2020年第1期17-24,共8页Journal of Chongqing University of Technology（Social Science）

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“应用逻辑与逻辑应用研究”(14ZDB014)

摘　　要：斯特劳森基于语义学和语用学区分的角度反驳了罗素的摹状词理论,但摹状词理论并不涉及语用学问题。所以,艾耶尔所强调的基于语用视角的“语境反驳”不是罗素对斯特劳森的反驳。摹状词理论的真正依据是“罗素区分”,即摹状词是“不完全符号”,因而和自我中心词严格不同,它不指称亲知对象并具有主体间性,这成了斯特劳森的反驳失败的根本原因。Strawson interprets the question of descriptive words as the distinction between semantics and pragmatics,but Russell and Strawson’s argument about the theory of descriptions is not a“philosophical way of thinking”dispute,so the context debate based on this perspective is not the real argument of Russell.The basis of descriptions theory is that descriptions are“incomplete symbol”which is strictly different from egocentric words and they do not refer to an object of acquaintance and have intersubjectivity.This constitutes the root cause of Strawson’s failure.

关 键 词：指称词项 自我中心词 语境 主体间性 亲知对象 

分 类 号：B81[哲学宗教—逻辑学]