文化规训空间视角下的近代岭南私家园林研究  

Study on Modern Lingnan Private Gardens Based on Cultural Disciplinary Space

作　　者：汤辉 朱凯[2] 陈君豪 TANG Hui;ZHU Kai;CHEN Jun-hao

机构地区：[1]华南农业大学林学与风景园林学院,广州510640 [2]广东工业大学艺术设计学院,广州510900

出　　处：《广东园林》2019年第6期9-13,共5页Guangdong Landscape Architecture

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目“近代岭南乡村园林艺术特色及其在乡村振兴中的传承研究”（编号：19YJC760094）;广东省哲学社会科学一般项目“自发性建造视野下广东乡村庭院地域性研究”（编号：GD18CYS11）;广州市哲学社会科学发展“十三五”规划项目“传统文化教育语境下的广州城市公园景观更新策略研究”（编号：2018GZYB59)

摘　　要：空间具有社会性,近代岭南私家园林作为一个家庭生活空间,有着文化规训权力的运作。从社会学视角开展对近代岭南私家园林空间的认知,分析文化规训权力的运作及与空间载体的依托关系,介绍近代岭南私家园林内文化规训的文字型载体和图像型载体2种主要表达形式,总结出"求学之道""立志抒怀""为人处世""收族睦家"4种文字型载体的内容主题,并进一步分析官宦、文人和商人以及华侨不同身份造园主体文化规训内容存在的差异。Space has social property. As a family living space, modern Lingnan private gardens have the operation of cultural discipline power. This paper develops the spatial cognition of modern Lingnan private gardens from the perspective of sociology, analyzes the interdependent relationship between operation of the cultural discipline power and space carrier, and introduces two main forms of expression which are character carrier and image carrier in the cultural discipline of Lingnan private gardens. Four kinds of character carriers of cultural discipline are summarized, including "study principles", "emotional expressions", "philosophy of life" and "family reinforcement". Finally, the differences in cultural discipline contents among different garden owners such as official, scholar, merchant and overseas Chinese are further analyzed.

关 键 词：近代岭南园林 文化规训 微观权力 空间社会学 

分 类 号：TU986[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]