检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:平卫伟[1] 郑建中[1] 郭崇政[1] 杨慧[1] 石嫣 PING Weiwei;ZHENG Jianzhong;GUO Chongzheng;YANG Hui;SHI Yan(Department of Preventive Medicine,Changzhi Medical College,Changzhi 046000,China)
机构地区:[1]长治医学院预防医学系社会医学与卫生事业管理学教研室
出 处:《基础医学教育》2020年第2期150-153,共4页Basic Medical Education
基 金:山西省教学改革创新项目(J2016077);山西省软科学研究项目(2018041033-1)
摘 要:为了解提升医学生证据评价能力的途径,随机抽取临床医学专业2个班的学生为研究对象,实验班采取强化证据评价的教学方法,对照班按照一般传统教学法进行讲授,课程结束后进行问卷调查。结果显示实验班和对照班对证据的认知程度之间没有统计学差异,对评价工具的了解程度的比较显示实验班学生处于知道等级的学生多于对照班学生,结果有统计学差异。实验班学生正确使用评价工具的能力与对照班之间有统计学差异,实验班学生的能力高于对照班。To explore the ways of improving the evidence evaluation ability of medical students,2 classes were chosen randomly in the Clinical Medicine Department in Changzhi Medical College.Evidence intensive evaluation method was applied to the experimental class,while traditional teathing was applied to the control class. There was no statistically significant difference between the experimantal class and the control class on evidence cognition.There were statistically significant differences between the experimantal class and the control class on degree of familiarity and competence of evidence.Evidence intensive evaluation method can promote the ability of evidence evaluation of medical students.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222