建筑,何以谓之家园?——重思建筑本质的存在规定  

Architecture,Why Should be Home?——Rethinking theExistence of the Essence of Architecture

作　　者：耿芳兵[1] GENG Fang-bing(School of Philosophy,Reninin University of China,Beijing 100872)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学哲学院

出　　处：《科学．经济．社会》2019年第4期36-42,共7页Science Economy Society

基　　金：国家社会科学基金专项项目“政治哲学视域中的治国理政之道”(16ZZD025)阶段性成果;国家留学基金委支持(项目编号:201806360234)

摘　　要：建筑学和城市学意义上理解的建筑,多强调其空间结构、秩序和比例,是人改造空间的功能性产物,而这恰恰被哲学家批判为抽象尺度。人与空间的关系在建筑"物"的维度上被理解,导致真正的与人的交互关系被掩盖。借助对建筑本质的重新规定,具体包括:筑造蕴含的实践规定、栖居蕴含的保养规定和人的记忆与情感规定,可以将建筑的家园意义显现出来,这一探索为都市生活中出现的住房困难、栖居困境等现实难题的解决奠定理论基础。In the sense of architecture and urban studies, architectures are more emphasised on its spatial structure, order and proportion, which is a functional product of human practices of space. It is also precisely criticized by philosophers as an abstract scale. The relationship between man and space is understood in the dimension of the "object" of the building, resulting in a real interaction with people being concealed. With the re-thinking of the nature of the building including the practical provisions contained in the construction, the maintenance regulations contained in the dwellings, and the memory and emotional regulations of the people. The meaning of the homeland of the building is revealed, which is becoming the theoretical basis for solving the difficult problems such as living and dwelling problems.

关 键 词：建筑物 家园 栖居 存在规定 

分 类 号：B516.54[哲学宗教—外国哲学]