敦煌“于阗太子”与“曹氏太子”考  

Textual Research on the “Prince of Khotan” and the “Prince of the Cao Family” at Dunhuang

作　　者：杜海[1] DU Hai(Institute of Dunhuang Studies,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou,Gansu 730020)

机构地区：[1]兰州大学敦煌学研究所

出　　处：《敦煌研究》2019年第6期58-64,共7页Dunhuang Research

基　　金：国家社科基金西部项目“粟特人与唐宋之际西北历史文化变迁”（17XZS036）;兰州大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目“敦煌粟特史料整理研究”（18LZUJBWZY031）

摘　　要：曹氏归义军时期,敦煌文献中出现了大量"太子"称号,所指既有于阗太子,也有曹氏太子。敦煌文书关于"太子"的记载中,部分有明确的"于阗太子"称号;部分我们根据文书中的人名、于阗"天子窟"、于阗使者、于阗僧人等信息,可以推断相关"太子"称号为于阗太子。受到于阗"太子"称号影响,归义军政权也称节度使的儿子为"太子"。敦煌文书中,曹元忠应该有三个儿子被称为"太子",曹延禄至少有两个儿子被称为"太子"。The title of"Prince"as used in reference to the Prince of Khotan and the Cao Family appeared in many manuscripts among the Dunhuang documents which were left from the period of the Gui-yi-jun regime ruled by the Cao Family.Some of these documents specifically recorded the title as the"Prince of Khotan"whereas others provide additional information,such as the names of persons,mention of the cave of the Son of Heaven,and information on envoys and monks from Khotan,from this textual evidence the title"Prince"originally referred to the prince of Khotan.Influenced by this title,the sons of the governors of the Gui-yi-jun regime were also given the appellation"Prince."As the Dunhuang documents indicate,three sons of Cao Yuanzhong and at least two of Cao Yanlu were called"Prince."

关 键 词：敦煌 于阗 太子 曹元忠 曹延禄 

分 类 号：G256.1[文化科学—图书馆学] K870.6[历史地理—考古学及博物馆学]