检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李悦 刘晓明[1] LI Yue;LIU Xiaoming(College of Law,Guizhou Minzu University,Guiyang,Guizhou 550000,China)
机构地区:[1]贵州民族大学法学院
出 处:《衡水学院学报》2020年第2期113-116,共4页Journal of Hengshui University
摘 要:对于有效辩护概念的界定,应该重结果而非过程,不仅要依据律师职业标准来讨论,更要对司法机关及司法人员办案行为进行关注。当前影响有效辩护目标实现的原因很多,主要有:轻视辩护意见、对辩护作用的错误定位、不合理的庭审结构关系等。实现有效辩护价值目标,需要培养一支敬畏法律、崇尚正义的司法队伍;客观公正地评价律师工作;对我国刑事诉讼制度进行革命性重建。The definition of effective defense should focus on results rather than processes,not only to discuss it in accordance with the professional standards of lawyers,but also to pay attention to the handling of cases by judicial institutions and judicial personnel.At present,there are many reasons that affect the realization of the goal of effective defense,mainly including contempt of defense opinions,wrong positioning of the role of defense,unreasonable trial structure relationship,and so on.To achieve the goal of effective defense value,it is necessary to cultivate a judicial team that fears the law and respects justice,evaluates the work of lawyers objectively and fairly,and revolutionizes the reconstruction of China’s criminal procedure system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.48.34