苏轼史评论  

A Review of Su Shi’s History

作　　者：韦正春 WEI Zhengchun(School of Literature,Guizhou Normal University,Guiyang 550025,Guizhou,China)

机构地区：[1]贵州师范大学文学院

出　　处：《惠州学院学报》2020年第1期77-82,共6页Journal of Huizhou University

摘　　要：苏轼的史评文章众多,内容十分丰富,其史评以人物为中心,融儒、释、道为一体的史评观。苏轼对于人才的选拔有独特的见解,擅长纵横对比,借助古人之事评述当政之过,敢于质疑经典,发前人所未发之言。但是,由于受时代和自身地位的局限,苏轼的史评观仍有阙失,在品评历史人物时欠缺全面,以偏概全,有重文轻武的思想,对于一些历史规律缺乏认识,易陷入宿命论意识。We reviewed Su Shi’s historical criticism of many articles and found that the content is very rich,its historical criticism of the character is as the center,the fusion of Confucianism,Buddhism,Taoism as one of the historical criticism. Su Shi had a unique view for the selection of talents,being good at vertical and horizontal comparisons. With the help of the ancients to have a critical comments on the past,Su dared to question the classics,made the remarks that no predecessors have ever made. However,due to the limitations of the times and his own status,Su Shi’s historical criticism still has some shortcomings. When he appraises historical figures,he lacks a comprehensive view and overstates them. With the thought of emphasizing literature over martial arts,it is easy to fall into fatalism because of the lack of understanding of some historical laws.

关 键 词：苏轼 史评 特点 阙失 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]