股动脉穿刺后ExoSeal血管封堵器与人工压迫止血发生皮下血肿研究  

Study on Subcutaneous Hematoma of ExoSeal Vascular Closure Device and Artificial Hemostasis after Femoral Artery Puncture

作　　者：覃玉群 胡亚妮[1] 崔丽净 梁红梅[1] 陈嵩 QIN Yuqun;HU Yani;CUI Lijing;LIANG Hongmei;CHEN Song(Guangdong vocational college of food and drug,Guangzhou Guangdong 510000,China;The first affiliated hospital of sun yat-sen university,Guangzhou Guangdong 510000,China)

机构地区：[1]广东食品药品职业学院,广东广州510000 [2]中山大学第一附属医院,广东广州510001

出　　处：《临床研究》2020年第2期34-36,共3页Clinical Research

基　　金：广东食品药品职业学院重点专业（助产）建设项目(201012G1701)

摘　　要：目的比较股动脉鞘拔除中使用ExoSeal血管封堵器与人工压迫止血发生皮下血肿的情况。方法回顾2016年8月-2017年3月,295例股动脉鞘拔除患者病历资料,分为ExoSeal血管封堵器组(100例)和人工压迫组(195例),观察记录发生皮下血肿的例数以及皮下血肿的大小。结果ExoSeal血管封堵器组皮下血肿发生率明显高于人工压迫组,且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论股动脉鞘中使用ExoSeal血管封堵器较人工压迫发生皮下血肿风险高。Objective To compare the safety between ExoSeal vascular closure device and artificial hemostasis after femoral artery puncture.Methods Totally 295 patients treated with intervention through femoral artery puncture from August 2016 to March 2017 were enrolled and divided into ExoSeal closure device group and artificial hemostasis group.The number and size of subcutaneous hematoma were observed and recorded between the two groups.Results The incidence of hematoma was significantly higher in the ExoSeal closure device group than that in the artificial hemostasis group(P<0.05).Conclusion ExoSeal closure device can not decrease hematoma.

关 键 词：ExoSeal 血管封堵器 人工压迫止血 股动脉穿刺 皮下血肿 

分 类 号：R619.1[医药卫生—外科学]