简式韧性量表在中国大学生中的信效度检验  

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Brief Resilience Scale

作　　者：陈维[1] 刘洁[1] 罗杰[1] 刘国庆[1] CHEN Wei;LIU Jie;LUO Jie;LIU Guo-qing(School of Psychology,Guizhou Normal University,Guiyang 550001,China)

机构地区：[1]贵州师范大学心理学院

出　　处：《中国临床心理学杂志》2020年第1期24-28,共5页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目（18XJC190001）;贵州省学位办研究生教育创新计划项目（黔教合YJSCXJH(2018)029）;贵州省教育厅硕士点项目（2018ssd25）

摘　　要：目的:考察简式韧性量表在中国大学生中的信效度。方法:用简式韧性量表(BRS)、Connor-Davidson心理韧性量表(CR-RISC)、一般自我效能感量表(GSES)、一般健康问卷(GHQ12)、乐观问卷(LOT-R)以及自我韧性量表(ERS),对976名大学生进行调查。结果:6个条目校正后的题总相关系数在0.366~0.441之间;所有鉴别指数均达到了极其显著的水平。探索性因子分析和最小平均偏相关分析的结果支持简式韧性量表的单维度结构,验证性因子分析结果的拟合较好。BRS与CR-RISC、GSES、LOT-R和ERS的相关系数在0.352~0.443(P<0.001)之间,而与GHQ12的相关系数为-0.422(P<0.001)。BRS的克伦巴赫alpha系数为0.778(0.751,0.801)。一个月后,两次BRS的相关系数为0.576(0.389,0.716)。BRS的问卷辨识度为0.939(0.933,0.944)。结论:简式韧性量表(中文版)具有良好的信效度,能够有效地测量大学生的心理韧性。Objective:To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Brief Resilience Scale(BRS).Methods:A sample of 976 university students in Guizhou province of BRS,Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale(CD-RISC),General Health Questionnaire(GHQ12),Life Orientation Test-Revise(LOT-R),General Self-Efficacy Scale(GSES)and Ego-Resiliency Scale(ERS).Results:The item-test correlations were from 0.366 to 0.441.The exploratory factor analysis and minimum average partial correlation analysis showed that the BRS was unidimensional,and the indexes of confirmatory factor analysis was good.The BRS was significantly and associated with CD-RISC,GSES,GHQ-12,LOT-R and ERS.The Cronbach alpha coefficient of BRS was 0.778(0.751,0.801),and the tests-retest reliability across one month was 0.576(0.389,0.716).The delta coefficient was 0.939(0.933,0.944).Conclusion:The Chinese version of BRS has good psychometrics in undergraduates.

关 键 词：韧性 压力 信度 效度 问卷辨识度 

分 类 号：R395.1[哲学宗教—心理学]