论南宋浙学对宋代道学的批判  

On the Criticism on Zhejiang Thought in the Southern Song Dynasty to Taoism in Song Dynasty

作　　者：朱晓鹏[1] Zhu Xiaopeng(Institute of Chinese Philosophy and Culture,Hangzhou Normal University,Hangzhou 311121)

机构地区：[1]杭州师范大学中国哲学与文化研究所

出　　处：《浙江社会科学》2020年第2期126-133,150,159,160,共11页Zhejiang Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“‘群经统类’的文献整理与宋明儒学研究”(13&ZD061)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：尽管宋代道学曾经构成南宋浙学的形成和发展的重要思想资源,但南宋浙学与道学并不属于同一个思想派别,更不能说它是道学的一个分支学派。相反,它们之间存在着许多根本的差别,甚至构成了相互批判的思想对立和竞争。而南宋浙学恰恰正是在对宋代道学展开直接或间接的批判中实现了自己的发展演变和超越。它们之间这种复杂的关系反映了转型期的唐宋社会变革的许多基本特征,具有重要的思想意义,同时也展示了南宋浙学作为没有严格意义上传承师从的学脉关系和门户形式的独特学派所始终追求的"自为门庭"的学术独立性和思想转型的范式创新性。Although Taoism in the Song Dynasty constituted an important ideological resource for the formation and development of Zhejiang thought in the Southern Song Dynasty, Zhejiang thought in the Southern Song Dynasty and Taoism did not belong to the same ideological school, let alone a branch of Taoism. On the contrary, there are many fundamental differences between them which even constitute the confrontation and competition of the critical thinking. Zhejiang thought in the Southern Song Dynasty is precise-ly in the direct or indirect criticism of the Song Dynasty Daoism, to achieve its own development evolution and beyond. The complex relationship between them also reflects many basic features of the social transformation of the Tang and Song Dynasties in the transitional period and has important ideological significance. It also shows the academic independence and paradigm innovation of the thought transition that Zhejiang thought in the Southern Song Dynasty pursued by the special schools of family form and the academic relationship without strict sense of inheritance.

关 键 词：南宋浙学 道学 思想转型 学术独立 范式创新 

分 类 号：B244[哲学宗教—中国哲学]