检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张彦霞[1] 施蕊 张风华[1] 康静[2] ZHANG Yan-xia;SHI Rui;ZHANG Feng-hua;KANG Jing(Department of Stomatology,Shijiazhuang First Hospital,Shijiazhuang,Hebei 050000,China)
机构地区:[1]石家庄市第一医院口腔科,河北石家庄050000 [2]冀中能源峰峰集团总医院口腔科,河北邯郸056200
出 处:《中国临床研究》2020年第2期211-213,217,共4页Chinese Journal of Clinical Research
基 金:石家庄市科学技术研究与发展技术项目(181460393)~~
摘 要:目的探讨两种不同的修复方式用于根管治疗后后牙楔状缺损修复治疗的效果。方法选取2017年1月至6月石家庄市第一医院口腔科收治的60例根管治疗后后牙楔状缺损修复患者,根据患者主观选择修复方式分为A组和B组,各30例。A组采用纤维桩+复合树脂+氧化锆烤瓷冠修复,B组采用金属桩核+金属烤瓷冠修复。对比两组修复成功率,修复前后的牙龈菌斑指数、牙龈指数、牙周探诊深度及修复后的效果。结果修复后6个月复查,两组患者修复成功率比较差异无统计学意义(100. 00%vs 93. 33%,P>0. 05)。修复后1年复查,A组患者的修复成功率高于B组,差异有统计学意义(96. 67%vs 73. 33%,P<0. 05)。修复后1年,A组患者的菌斑指数、牙龈指数、牙周探诊深度均低于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0. 05,P<0. 01)。修复后1年,A组患者修复体的边缘密合性高于B组(P<0. 05)。两组修复体表面光滑、颜色匹配、固定良好率差异无统计学意义(P>0. 05)。结论采用纤维桩+复合树脂+氧化锆烤瓷冠修复管治疗后后牙楔状缺损的效果优于金属桩核+金属烤瓷冠修复。Objective To compare the effects of two different repair methods for root canal therapy on the posterior wedgeshaped defects. Methods Sixty patients with posterior wedge-shaped defect repair after root canal treatment from January 2017 to June 2017 were selected and divided into group A and group B(n = 30,each) according to the patient’ s supervisor. Fiber post,composite resin and zirconia porcelain crown repair were used in group A,and metal post core and metal porcelain crown repair were used in group B. The repair success rate,gingival plaque index before and after repair,gingival index,periodontal probing depth and the effect after repair were compared between two groups. Results After 6 months of repair,there was no significant difference in success rate of repair between two groups(100. 00% vs 93. 33%,P >0. 05). After one year of repair,the success rate in group A was statistically higher than that in group B(96. 67% vs73. 33%,P< 0. 05);the plaque index,gingival index and periodontal probing depth were significantly lower than those in group B(P< 0. 05,P< 0. 01);the edge adhesion in patient’s prosthesis in group A was higher than that in group B(P<0. 05). There were no statistically differences in the surface smoothness,color matching and fixation rate between two groups(P >0. 05). Conclusion The effect of fiber post,composite resin and zirconia porcelain crown repair is better than metal post core and metal porcelain crown repair on the posterior teeth wedge defect after root canal therapy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49