认罪认罚从宽制度中的认罪答辩撤回:从法理到实证的考察  

Withdrawal of Guilty Plea of Leniency System for Confession and Punishment:Nomological and Empirical Analysis

作　　者：郭松[1] Guo Song

机构地区：[1]四川大学法学院

出　　处：《政法论坛》2020年第1期106-119,共14页Tribune of Political Science and Law

基　　金：四川大学中央高校基本科研业务费研究专项(法学)项目(2018fxzy-01)的研究成果,四川大学法学院“双一流”建设专项支持

摘　　要：被追诉人撤回认罪答辩具有救济非真实认罪与平衡控辩双方不对等利益结构的功能。虽然认罪答辩撤回是自我决定权的一种体现,被追诉人并不因此而承担不利后果,但也不能随意撤回。被追诉人能否撤回认罪答辩,现行刑事诉讼法并未作出明确规定。在前期的试点过程中,地方司法机关对被追诉人撤回认罪答辩做了一些有益探索,但明显不够,且对很多问题的认识存在差异。在认罪认罚从宽制度的后续改革中,既要明确认可被追诉人有权撤回认罪答辩,最大限度地释放认罪答辩撤回的潜在功能,也要防范被追诉人随意甚至滥用撤回认罪答辩,避免产生不必要的程序耗费。The accused’s withdrawal of guilty plea has the function of remedying the non-authenticity of pleading guilty and balancing the unequal interest structure between the prosecutor and defendant.Although the withdrawal of guilty plea is a manifestation of the right to self-determination and the accused does not bear the adverse consequences,the accused cannot withdraw casually.The current Criminal procedure Law does not clearly define whether the accused can withdraw the guilty plea.In the previous pilot process,the local judicial organs did some useful explorations on the accused’s withdrawal of guilty plea.However,it was obviously not enough,and there were disagreements in the understanding of many issues.In the future reform of leniency system for confession and punishment,it is necessary to clearly recognize that the accused has the right to withdraw the guilty plea,to maximize the potential function of withdrawal system of guilty plea,and to prevent the accused from casually using or abusing withdrawal the guilty plea,to avoid unnecessary procedural costs.

关 键 词：认罪认罚从宽 认罪答辩撤回 制度建构 程序滥用 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]