检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:步晓光 BU Xiao-guang(Law School,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China)
机构地区:[1]北京大学法学院
出 处:《税务与经济》2020年第1期84-93,共10页Taxation and Economy
摘 要:跳开增值税专用发票尽管在形式上构成虚开行为,在内容上与真实交易不符,但该行为实质上是对增值税进项抵扣链条中由于税率"陷落"而产生的缺陷的修复,与税收中性原则相符,不会造成国家增值税收入实质性的损失,因而不具备税收执法与刑事司法上的可罚性。将跳开排除在虚开行为之外,需要对国家的增值税收入中各部分的正当性以及增值税专用发票管理制度的作用与目的进行重新思考,以确定国家享有的税收债权的范围,保障纳税人的限额纳税权,并且要在刑事司法领域对虚开增值税专用发票罪的犯罪构成和量刑依据进行统一。Although skipping VAT special invoices is a false opening behavior in terms of form and it is not in conformity with the real transaction in terms of content,it is the fixation of the defect owning to the"falling"of the tax rate in the VAT inward deduction chain.It is in line with the tax neutral principle,and will not cause a substantial loss of the national value-added tax revenue.Therefore,it should not be punished in tax enforcement and criminal justice.It is necessary to rethink the legitimacy of the various parts of the national VAT income and the role and purpose of the VAT invoice management system if skipping is excluded from falsely opening behaviors.It is still important to clarify the scope of the national tax claims and protect the limited taxation right of taxpayers.It is also crucial to unify the criminal constitution and sentencing basis of the crime of falsely opening a special VAT invoice in the criminal justice field.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222