马克思与黑格尔的历史进步观三要素对比分析  

Analyzing the Three Elements of Marx’s and Hegel’s Historical Progress View

作　　者：万丽华 龚培河 WAN Lihua;GONG Peihe(School of Marxism,Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210044)

机构地区：[1]南京信息工程大学马克思主义学院

出　　处：《长白学刊》2020年第1期45-50,共6页Changbai Journal

基　　金：国家哲学社会科学重点基金项目：“唯物史观微观叙事及其当代价值研究”（19AKS004）;2018年江苏省一般项目“矛盾出场形态与社会主要矛盾时代性研究”（18MLD002）

摘　　要：马克思是在扬弃黑格尔唯心主义历史进步观基础上来阐释唯物主义历史进步观的,二者存在本质区别。在历史进步逻辑起点上,黑格尔确认"理性",马克思确认"生产力";在历史进步逻辑运行上,黑格尔确认"理性的狡计",马克思确认"线性进步逻辑";在历史进步终点上,黑格尔确认"绝对精神",马克思确认"共产主义"。通过三点对比分析,揭开马克思的历史进步观的内在逻辑规定:历史进步性只是从生产力出发推导出来的线性逻辑规定,由于这一线性逻辑规定合乎一个民族、一个文明体求生存谋发展的本质要求,彻底偏离出它逻辑规定的文明都成了死文明,那么,当下世界正在绽放的文明的历史都必然围绕它螺旋式上升运动。共产主义恰恰就是现实的历史在发展过程中不断趋近线性逻辑规定的社会发展状态。Marx explained the materialist view of historical progress on the basis of abandoning Hegel’s idealistic view of historical progress,and there is an essential difference between them.On the logical starting point of historical progress,Hegel confirms"rationality",and Marx confirms"productivity".On the logical operation of historical progress,Hegel confirms"rational guile",and Marx confirms"linear progression logic".At the end of historical progress,Hegel confirms"absolute spirit",and Marx confirms"communism".Uncovering the inherent logic of Marx’s view of historical progress through comparative analysis of the three aspects:historical progress is only a linear logic rule derived from productivity,and because it accords with the essential requirements of a nation and a civilization for survival and development,the civilization that completely deviated from it comes to its end.So the history of the civilization that is now blooming in the world is bound to spiral rise revolving around it.Communism is precisely the social development state that the history of reality keeps approaching the linear logic rule in the development process.

关 键 词：马克思 黑格尔 历史进步观 共产主义 

分 类 号：B20[哲学宗教—中国哲学]