检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘峻杉[1] 侯前伟 LIU Jun-shan;HOU Qian-wei(Elementary Education College Capital Normal University,Beijing 100048 China;Faculty of Education Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875 China)
机构地区:[1]首都师范大学初等教育学院,北京100048 [2]北京师范大学教育学部,北京100875
出 处:《苏州大学学报(教育科学版)》2020年第1期33-40,共8页Journal of Soochow University(Educational Science Edition)
基 金:国家社会科学基金2017年度教育学一般课题“中国传统核心价值观与当代德育的共鸣融合”(项目编号:BEA170110)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:新时代的德育研究需要深刻反思自身的研究范式和功能,并加以方法论层面的优化。"知识生产"的视角发人深思,但其暗含的对差异性和原创性的追求,可能会把德育理论研究带往一条"知性"路线和碎片化的境地。寻找其他可兹补充的视角或功能描述,从而形成整全的视域,就成为值得探索的问题。先秦时期的"文化"意涵以及当代中国鲁洁教授等学者的德育研究,都启迪了一种新的"文化"视角的可能性。本文将区别于"知识生产"视角而反映"文化"传递路径的视角,概括为"文化诠释",其强调的内容,既有根植于人类文明基础的宏大视野和境界本根之论,也有直指人心、精微灵动之"文光"。"知识生产"与"文化诠释"这两种视角相映成趣,对其来源、目标、相关隐喻、功能、评价标准等的对照比较可以将这两种视角的特点和价值阐释得更为清楚。这两种视角也反映了德育理论研究的两种功能或取向需要相互关联和彼此圆融。Reviewing and summarizing the history of the study of moral education theory in China requires an effective perspective and a reflection on methodology. The perspective of "knowledge production ",though thought-provoking,seems to have its limitations.Its implicit emphasis on the pursue of difference and originality may lead research efforts on moral education theory to a direction of "intellectuality"and divergence. Thus,seeking alternative perspectives or functional descriptions for a more comprehensive view becomes a problem worth exploring.Drawing from the meaning of "culture"in the pre-Qin period and the study of moral education by Professor Lu Jie in contemporary China,this article proposes a possible alternative perspective.With a focus on the transmission path of "culture ",which distinguished itself from the perspective of "knowledge production",the "cultural interpretation"approach retains the emphasis in traditional perspectives: the grand vision and the root in the foundation of human civilization;the subtle yet embracing "text light"that shines directly upon human mind.The two perspectives of"knowledge production"and"cultural interpretation"can be productively read by comparing their sources,goals,metaphors that have been derived therefrom,functions,and evaluation criteria for a better understanding of their characteristics and values. These two perspectives also reflect the two functions or orientations of moral education theory,which need to be interrelated and compatible with each other.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.154.119