纯粹理性的运用与何种理性的运用相对——《实践理性批判》导论中的译解难题  

Corresponding Relationship between the Application of the Pure Reason and the Application of What Kind of Reason——the Translation Problems in the Introduction to Critique of Practical Reason

作　　者：舒远招 SHU Yuan-zhao(Department of Philosophy,Yuelu Academy of Hunan University,Changsha 410082,China)

机构地区：[1]湖南大学岳麓书院

出　　处：《南通大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第2期19-27,共9页Journal of Nantong University:Social Sciences Edition

摘　　要：“实践理性批判”的理念是:要阐明“有纯粹实践理性”,阻止经验性—有条件的实践理性想要独自冒充意志的规定根据的“僭妄”。康德因此认为,惟有纯粹理性的运用是“界内的”;相反,经验性—有条件的理性的运用是“越界的”。《实践理性批判》导论中的省略表达式der empirisch-bedingte,只能在第二格的意义上被理解为“经验性—有条件的理性”,而不能在第一格的意义上被理解为“经验性—有条件的运用”,即使在“经验性—有条件的运用”后面添加“理性”或“纯粹理性”也不可行。在这里,纯粹实践理性的运用与何种理性的运用相对。The idea of“critique of practical reason”is to clarify that“there is pure practical reason”,and to keep the empirically-conditioned practical reason from presuming to be the“blasphemy”of the determining basis of the free will.Kant therefore holds that only the use of pure reason is“immanent”;on the contrary,the use of empirically conditioned reason is“transcendent”.The ellipsis expression der empirisch-bedingte in the introduction to Critique of Practical Reason can only be understood in the sense of the second casus as empirically-conditioned reason,but not in the sense of the first casus as the empirically-conditioned use.Even adding reason or pure reason to the empirically-conditioned use is not feasible.Here,the use of pure practical reason corresponds to the use of what kind of practical reason.

关 键 词：一般实践理性 纯粹理性 经验性—有条件的理性 运用 

分 类 号：B516.31[哲学宗教—外国哲学]