撤销之诉与确认无效之诉转化的法理及条件——基于《行诉解释》第九十四条  

The Legal Principles and Conditions for the Reversal of the Lawsuit of Revocation and the Confirm Invalid Lawsuit: Based on Article 94 of The Administrative Litigation Law

作　　者：周学文 ZHOU Xuewen(Law School,ZheJiang GongShang University,Hangzhou Zhejiang 310018,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江工商大学法学院

出　　处：《成都理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第1期24-29,共6页Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Social Sciences

基　　金：浙江工商大学法学院研究生科研创新基金项目“行政判决与原告诉讼请求间关系问题研究”(17020070014)

摘　　要：《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国行政诉讼法〉的解释》第九十四条规定了撤销之诉与确认无效之诉相互转化的条件及程序,其法理基础在于《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》第六条所确立的合法性审查原则及行政诉讼的客观诉讼属性。在转化条件上,从确认无效之诉转为撤销之诉需以原告经法院释明变更诉讼请求为前提,而逆向的转化则无此要求。这一要求实际上是防止原告规避起诉期限的规制性设计,并隐含着最高人民法院对确认无效之诉不适用起诉期限的肯定性立场。Article 94 of Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court on the Application of the Administrative Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China stipulates that the mutual conversion of the lawsuit of revocation and the Confirm invalid lawsuit.The legal basis is the principle of legality review and the objective lawsuit of administrative litigation established in Article 6 of The Administrative Procedure Law.In terms of conversion conditions,the change from the confirmation of invalidation to the revocation of the lawsuit is subject to the plaintiff’s interpretation of the change of the lawsuit by the court,and the reverse conversion does not require this.This requirement is actually a regulatory design that prevents the plaintiff from evading the time limit for prosecution,and implies that the affirmative position of Supreme People’s Court on the time limit for the indictment is not applicable.

关 键 词：合法性审查原则 撤销之诉 确认无效之诉 起诉期限 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]