检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张东奇[1] 韩春梅[1] 董灿 Zhang Dongqi;Han Chunmei;Dong Can(Clinical&Basic Medicine Item Development Division,National Medical Examination Center,Beijing 100097,China;Department of Medical Engineering,the Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital,Beijing 100048,China)
机构地区:[1]国家医学考试中心临床与基础试题开发处,北京100097 [2]中国人民解放军总医院第四医学中心医学工程科,北京100048
出 处:《中华医学教育探索杂志》2020年第1期18-21,共4页Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
摘 要:医师资格考试是大多数国家普遍采用的医师资格认证形式。医学人文的考核在医师资格考试中占有重要地位。以临床类别考试为例,通过文献分析、比较研究的方法,比较分析中美两国执业医师资格考试和医师资格分阶段考试实证研究考试中的医学人文考核,包括考试内容和形式、考试分值及比例。发现两国医学人文考核内容和比例基本相当,但我国现行考试医学人文考核站数较少,考试形式和呈现方式有待进一步改善,下一步应继续探索标准化病人应用于我国医师资格考试的可行性,充分发挥医师资格考试对医学教育的导向作用。Medical licensing examination is a well-accepted form to authenticate physicians'qualification for practicing in most countries.Assessment of medical humanities is of great importance in medical licensing examination.In this study,the medical humanity evaluation,including contents,forms,scores and proportion of the scores of the examinations,in the medical licensing examination and the empirical research examination of segmental physician examination in China and the United States was compared by analyzing literatures and comparative approach,with the clinical examinations as examples.Results showed that contents and proportion of the scores of medical humanities in the two countries were basically the same,but there were fewer stations in current medical licensing examination in China and improvement should be made in the examination form.The feasibility of standard patients in China's medical licensing examination should be further explored,so as to make full use of the guiding role of medical licensing examination in medical education.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112