检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:段彩彬[1] 周会 袁堃 张丽华 DUAN Caibin;ZHOU Hui;YUAN Kun;ZHANG Lihua(Students' Affairs Division,Shenyang Agricultural University,Shenyang 110866,China;Dean's Office,Shenyang Medical College,Shenyang 110034,China;Psychology School,Liaoning Normal University,Dalian 116029,Liaoning Province,China)
机构地区:[1]沈阳农业大学学生处,沈阳110866 [2]沈阳医学院教务处,沈阳110034 [3]辽宁师范大学心理学院,辽宁大连1160
出 处:《中国心理卫生杂志》2020年第4期367-372,共6页Chinese Mental Health Journal
基 金:教育部人文社科研究专项任务项目(16JDSZ1017);辽宁省社会科学规划基金项目(L18CSH003);辽宁省教育科学“十三五”规划项目(JG17DB445)。
摘 要:目的:探讨不同高自尊类型大学生对攻击性信息认知加工时的注意偏向特点和注意控制特点。方法:选取某校大一学生714人,使用自尊量表(SES)、内隐联想测验(IAT)筛选出脆弱型高自尊组和安全型高自尊组各51人;两组依次完成不同时间间隔(450ms和1200ms)下的空间线索实验任务,根据RT回避警觉和RT固着回避值,获得注意偏向特点;两组依次完成Flanker实验任务,根据被试类型和一致性的交互作用结果,获得注意控制特点。结果:时间间隔为450ms时,脆弱型高自尊组的RT回避警觉值低于安全型高自尊组(P<0.05);时间间隔为1200ms时,脆弱型高自尊组的RT固着回避值高于安全型高自尊组(P<0.001)。被试类型和一致性的交互作用结果无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:不同高自尊类型大学生在注意不同阶段的攻击性注意偏向成分不同,但注意控制不存在差异。Objective:To explore the characteristics of attention bias and attention control of college students with different types of high self-esteem.Methods:In 714 freshmen of a university,51 of them were selected from the fragile high self-esteem group and the secure high self-esteem group with the Self-Esteem Scale(SES)and the Implicit Association Test(IAT).The two groups completed the spatial cue experiment task in different time intervals(450 ms and 1200 ms),and the characteristics of attention bias were obtained by RT avoidance alert and RT fixation avoidance score.The two groups completed the flanker experiment task,and the characteristics of attention control were obtained by the interaction results of subject type and consistency.Results:The RT avoidance alert scores were lower in the fragile high self-esteem group than in the secure high self-esteem group,when the time interval was 450 ms(P<0.05).The RT fixation avoidance scores were higher in the fragile high self-esteem group than in the secure high self-esteem group(P<0.001),when the time interval was 1200 ms.There was no statistical significance in the interaction results of subject type and consistency(P>0.05).Conclusion:Different types of high self-esteem college students may have different components of aggressive attention bias in different stages of attention,while there may be no difference in attention control.
分 类 号:B844.2[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30