检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:秦安兰[1] Qin Anlan(School of Humanities,Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics,Nanchang 330013,Jiangxi,China)
出 处:《征信》2020年第2期27-32,共6页Credit Reference
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(17BSH130)。
摘 要:公信力是慈善组织的生命线,频发的慈善负面事件使得慈善组织公信力处于危险境地,但同时也带来公信力重建的机遇。慈善组织公信力建设是现代福利国家的必然选择。慈善组织公信力重建路径具有多维性,重建过程中需要注重慈善组织自身建设、政府与慈善组织的关系建设、公益慈善法律法规体系建设和多元监督体系与第三方评估建设这四个方面。此外,透明度建设是慈善组织公信力重建的突破口,提升诚信度和慈善能力是慈善组织公信力重建的内在动力,第三方评估和监督机制是慈善组织公信力重建的外在动力。Credibility is the lifeline of charities. The occurrence of repetitive negative incidents puts the credibility of charities in danger, but brings opportunities for the reconstruction of their credibility as well. The construction of charities’ credibility is an inevitable choice for modern welfare states. The path for reconstructing charities’ credibility is multi-dimensional, and we need to pay attention to the four constructions in the reconstructing process: charities, the relationship between government and charities, laws and regulations on charities, multi-regulatory system and third-party evaluation. In addition, the construction of transparency is the breakthrough for the reconstruction of charities’ credibility, the enhancement of integrity and charitableness is the internal driving force, and the third-party evaluation and regulatory mechanism is the external driving force.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117