再审吸收第三人撤销之诉的程序规则研究--以《民诉法解释》第301、302条为中心  

The Procedural Rules for the Incorporation of the Third-Party Revocation Action into the Retrial Procedure--A Study Centered on Article 301 & 302 of the Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court on the Application of the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China

作　　者：刘东[1] Liu Dong(Law School East China University of Political Science and Law)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律学院

出　　处：《法学家》2020年第2期149-159,195,196,共13页The Jurist

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目“民事第三人权利救济体系研究”(19YJC820034)的阶段性成果;华东政法大学科学研究项目;上海市教育发展基金会和上海市教育委员会“晨光计划”资助。

摘　　要：我国立法及司法解释为再审和第三人撤销之诉的启动设定了不同的要件,使得两类诉讼程序所涉及的基本要件事实存在着较大差异。即便再审程序和第三人撤销之诉就同一裁判文书或调解书作出不同的处理,也不能将之定性为矛盾裁判。因为对矛盾裁判的认定须同时结合裁判主文以及裁判理由进行,而要件事实的判断是裁判理由的重要组成部分。因此,唯有当存在作出矛盾裁判的风险时,才有必要将第三人的诉讼请求并入再审程序,其余情况下法院可分开审理。而程序合并后法院对当事人及第三人已实施诉讼行为的处理,应当符合程序保障的要求。Laws and judicial interpretations in China put forward different requirements for commencing a retrial and a third-party revocation action,which leads to different facts constituting the essential elements between the two types of proceedings. In view of this,it is acceptable that a retrial and a third-party revocation action may yield different judgments on the same case. Such different judgments are not contradictory to each other because the identification of contradictory adjudication must be combined with the referee’s main text and the reasons for the adjudication,and the essential facts are an important part of the reasons for the adjudication.Therefore,there is no need to incorporate a third-party revocation action into the retrial of the same case unless there is a risk of contradictory judgments. And the effect of litigation actions before the incorporation shall be decided subject to the principle of procedural guarantees.

关 键 词：再审程序 第三人撤销之诉 矛盾裁判 程序合并 程序规则 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]