审判中心视角下的监察调查讯问录像问题  

Video-recording of Interrogation by the Supervision Committee in the Perspective of the Trial Centralism

作　　者：朱奎彬 Zhu Kuibin

机构地区：[1]西南交通大学公共管理与政法学院 [2]西南交通大学“廉政与治理研究中心”

出　　处：《地方立法研究》2020年第2期67-78,共12页Local Legislation Journal

基　　金：2019年度成都市哲学社会科学规划研究项目“成都市深化‘智慧法院'建设的问题与经验研究”(编号:2019Z06);西南交通大学“廉政与治理研究中心”2019年科研项目“反腐追赃、追逃视角下的缺席审判制度适用问题研究”的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：讯问全程同步录音录像制度是从我国职务犯罪侦查中发展起来的一项规范讯问程序,并有望逐步过渡到刑事证据规范。监察调查应当坚持“以审判为中心”的立法原则,然而目前调查录像“留存备查”的规定及其解释方式不能够满足以审判为中心的司法改革要求。坚持以审判为中心的原则,要求确立侦查调查程序的可视化为理论基础,确立监察调查讯问录像的电子口供证据资格。应通过对《监察法》的法律解释或实施细则,将“留存备查”扩大解释为对讯问录音录像进行全面移送,或至少能以便捷方式调取,尤其应当允许辩护方有调取的申请权,并且能有效参与调取审看程序。The simultaneous video recording of the interrogation was developed from the investigation of duty-related crimes by the prosecutrates.It is expected to be gradually developed to the norms of criminal evidence.The investigation by supervision committee shall adhere to the principle of Trial Centralism, however, the current "retention-for-examination" of the investigation video and its interpretation cannot meet the requirements of the principle of Trial Centralism.Trial Centralism requires that the interrogation process should be transparent to the trial and the status of the videos electronic confession evidence should be well established.The formal interpretation of the Supervision Law should clarify that "keeping for reference" is a complete transfer of the audios and videos of the interrogation or at least a more convenient way of accessing such audios or videos.In particular, the defense should be allowed to apply for an access to the video and be able to effectively participate in the reviewing process.

关 键 词：监察调查 讯问录音录像 以审判为中心 留存备查 移送制度 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]