制定法中的目的解释--以英美国家为中心  

Purposivism in Statutory Interpretation:Methodological Review Based on the Common Law

作　　者：王云清[1] Wang Yunqing

机构地区：[1]厦门大学法学院

出　　处：《法制与社会发展》2020年第1期172-187,共16页Law and Social Development

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目“司法裁量的运作机制与偏差控制研究”(17CFX054)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：制定法中的目的解释源于普通法上的"制定法的衡平"理念,经由现实主义法学的发展和法律过程学派的接续,得以成为主流解释方法之一。目的解释的证明理由包括忠实代理人模型、语言哲学的证立。就立法目的的推导技术而言,司法者可以参考内在渊源和外在渊源,从法律文本、立法背景、社会环境、抽象法伦理等多个层面上推究立法目的。然而,囿于司法制度能力不足、立法过程的复杂性和解释结论的不确定性,目的解释并非逻辑严密的司法技术。The purposivism in statutory interpretation is derived from the idea of "equity of statute" in the common law,which has become one of the mainstream interpretation methods in American law by the development of the Legal Process School and judicial practice. The justification of the purpose interpretation includes the faithful agent model and linguistic philosophy. Based on the reasons of political philosophy,purposivism has gradually become an important interpretive technique.On the attribution of purpose,judges can rely on the internal resources and the external resources,such as legal text,the legislative history,social context,and abstract legal ideal. However,the purposive interpretation approach is still not a set of sophisticated judicial techniques,because of the weakness of judicial capability,the complexity of the legislative process and the uncertainty of conclusion.

关 键 词：立法目的 除弊规则 法律过程学派 

分 类 号：D910[政治法律—法学]