仲裁庭自裁管辖权立法论  

On the Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunal

作　　者：侯梦凡 HOU Meng-fan(Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing,China,401120)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学,重庆401120

出　　处：《广东开放大学学报》2020年第1期47-54,共8页JOURNAL OF GUANGDONG OPEN UNIVERSITY

基　　金：西南政法大学法学院2019年科研创新项目“比较法视野下的临时仲裁制度研究”(FXY2019062)科研成果。

摘　　要：仲裁庭自裁管辖权是现代国际商事仲裁中一项重要的基本原则,该原则确定了仲裁庭是其管辖权问题的首个裁定者,保证仲裁庭的优先决定权。其核心在于延迟法院介入仲裁的时间和条件,以保证仲裁程序的正常进行。该原则并不排斥法院的司法监督,反而尊重司法最终解决原则,强调仲裁程序和司法监督的平衡。我国并未对自裁管辖权原则进行明确承认,现有规定也未能渗透该原则的核心内容,导致该原则在我国实践应用中出现种种弊端,如仲裁权力错配、仲裁效率低下、当事人缺乏司法救济等。我国应当借鉴国际上有关自裁管辖权的立法模式,通过对现行仲裁法的修改,尽快确立仲裁庭自裁管辖权,以发挥仲裁程序的应有价值,提升我国仲裁制度的国际竞争力。The arbitral tribunal’s discretion is an important basic principle in modern international commercial arbitration.This principle determines that the arbitral tribunal is the first arbiter of its jurisdiction and guarantees the priority of the arbitral tribunal.The core is to delay the time and conditions for the court to intervene in the arbitration to ensure the normal conduct of the arbitration process.This principle does not exclude the judicial supervision of the court.Instead,it respects the principle of judicial final settlement and emphasizes the balance between arbitration procedures and judicial supervision.China has not explicitly recognized the principle of discretionary jurisdiction,and the existing provisions have not penetrated the core content of the principle,which has led to various disadvantages in the practical application of the principle in our country,such as mismatch of arbitration power,low arbitration efficiency,and lack of justice relief for the parties,etc.China should learn from the international legislative model on self-arbitration jurisdiction,and amend the existing arbitration law to establish the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal as soon as possible,so as to give play to the due value of arbitration procedures and enhance the international competitiveness of our arbitration system.

关 键 词：自裁管辖权 管辖权异议 仲裁庭 司法审查 

分 类 号：D925.7[政治法律—诉讼法学]