检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:涂科 杨学成[2] TU Ke;YANG Xue-cheng(Shool of Economics and Management,Hubei University of Technology,Wuhan,Hubei,430068,China;Shool of Economics and Management,Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications,Beijing,100876,China)
机构地区:[1]湖北工业大学经济与管理学院,湖北武汉430068 [2]北京邮电大学经济管理学院,北京100876
出 处:《经济管理》2020年第4期192-208,共17页Business and Management Journal ( BMJ )
基 金:国家社科基金一般项目“价值共创视角下顾客参与的质量贡献机制研究”(17BGL090);国家自然科学青年基金项目“在线公益项目中捐赠者价值的创造机制及其对公众持续捐赠的影响研究”(71704049);湖北省教育厅哲学社会科学研究项目“视频型第三方评论场景下专业人士笑容强度对顾客的影响研究”(19Y042)。
摘 要:学术界对共享经济已经展开了大量研究,但对于“共享经济到底是什么?”尚未达成共识。基于回顾与梳理共享经济领域内的重要文献发现,造成分歧的主要原因是:(1)共享经济在闲置资源、平台及共享动机三个特征上存在争议;(2)共享经济类型的划分存在差异。为此,本文首先对共享经济的特征争议进行了分析与和解,其次基于“个体—组织”视角对共享经济的类型进行了统一划分,最后构建了共享经济的个体与组织的整合模型并对未来的研究方向进行了展望。本文试图通过解决共享经济领域研究中存在的争议与问题来揭示共享经济本质,进而帮助学术界与企业界深化对共享经济的理解与判断。Academic circles have carried out a lot of research on the sharing economy,but the question“what exactly is the sharing economy?”No consensus has been reached.Based on the review of the important literature in the field of sharing economy,it is found that the main reasons for the differences are:(1)the sharing economy has disputes on the three characteristics of idle resources,platform and sharing motivation;(2)there are differences in the classification of sharing economy types.For this reason,this paper provides a systematic literature review on sharing economy in business and management field.We collected literature from two sources in the classification of economics and management science:in English literature aspect,we searched the EBSCO Business Source Complete database for peer review academic articles in SSCI and SCI journals.In Chinese literature respect,we searched the CNKI database for academic papers published in CSSCI journals.Then,we use three methods to supplement the initial literature collection:first,we further obtained the literature of Sharing economy through the references of collected literature;Second,we supplemented highly relevant government reports and guidances;Third,we found the terms that may be neglected to express the connotation of sharing economy through discussion with authoritative experts and scholars in the field of sharing economy and searched by using them.After literature screening,we obtained a total of 117 literature.English literature includes 83 papers and 2 books;Chinese literature includes 28 papers and 4 reports.Next,this paper firstly analyzes and reconcile the characteristic disputes of the sharing economy.Firstly,we use two-level criteria to integrate the judgment logic of two idle resources.The primary criterion is whether to produce for the initial purpose of sharing.The secondary standard includes three indicators:relative idle advantage,long-term effect and external effect.Secondly,we also use two-level criteria to integrate the judgment logic of sharing e
关 键 词:共享经济 特征争议 个体与组织的整合模型 闲置资源
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117