检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马珊珊[1] 姜明 Ma Shanshan;Jiang Ming(Harbin University of Science and Technology,Haerbin Heilongjiang 150090;Datong District People’s Procuratorate of Daqing City,Daqing Heilongjiang 163000)
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨理工大学法学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150090 [2]大庆市大同区人民检察院,黑龙江大庆163000
出 处:《警学研究》2020年第1期90-98,共9页Police Science Research
基 金:2018年黑龙江省社会科学研究项目“审查逮捕诉讼化程序的构建”阶段性研究成果,项目编号:18FXE448。
摘 要:党的十八届四中全会《关于全面推进依法治国若干重大问题的决定》规定:“推进以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革,确保侦查、审查起诉的案件事实证据经得起法律的检验。”同时,提出“完善对限制人身自由司法措施和侦查手段的司法监督。”审查逮捕制度其实质是检察机关对限制人身自由的司法审查。从我国审查逮捕制度的现状及存在问题出发,立足我国现实,在深化司法改革背景下,对检察机关审查逮捕的诉讼化改造提出思考和完善路径。The Decision of the Fourth Plenary Session of the Eighteenth Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on Several Important Issues Concerning the Comprehensive Advancement of Governing the Country According to Law stipulates:“Promote the reform of the litigation system centered on trials to ensure that the factual evidence of investigation and examination of prosecution cases can withstand the legal inspection.”and“improving judicial supervision of judicial measures and investigative measures that restrict personal freedom.”Proceeding from the reality and existing problems of this system of China,in the context of deepening judicial reform,put forward its own thinking and improvement path to the procedural reform of prosecutorial organs’review of arrests.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.224.2.133