检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵玉霞 ZHAO Yu-xia(Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin 300387,China)
机构地区:[1]天津师范大学,天津300387
出 处:《哈尔滨学院学报》2020年第3期18-22,共5页Journal of Harbin University
摘 要:洛克的平等理论不似其自由思想那般得到广泛的关注,主要原因是其平等理论内化于自由思想,且平等理论具有广泛的争议。文章通过对其“人人平等”的平等理论的内涵进行考察,对其平等思想的基础即产品论证和自然法,与理性的基础进行阐述,进而对剑桥学派与施特劳斯学派的代表人物邓恩与施特劳斯等对洛克的平等理论的解读进行述评,指出两大学派对洛克平等理论的解读存在不融贯的问题,最后对洛克的平等理论给出了一个比较融贯的解释。Locke’s equality theory is not as widely concerned as his freedom theory.The main reason is that his equality theory is internalized in libertinism,and his equality theory is widely controversial.This paper investigates the connotation of equality theory of“everyone is equal”,expounds the basis of equality theory,that is,product argumentation,natural law and rational basis,and then comments on the interpretation of Locke’s equality theory by Dunn and Strauss,the representatives of Cambridge school and Strauss school,and points out the existence of the interpretation of Locke’s equality theory by the two universities.Finally,it gives a more consistent explanation to Locke’s equality theory.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170