检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周艳菊[1] 胡凤英[1] 周正龙[1] ZHOU Yanju;HU Fengying;ZHOU Zhenglong(School of Business,Central South University,Changsha 410012,China)
出 处:《管理工程学报》2020年第2期194-204,共11页Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助面上项目(71471178);国家自然科学基金资助重点项目(71431006);国家自然科学基金资助重大国际合作项目(71210003);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(2017zzts050)。
摘 要:针对绿色环保产品价格过高,阻碍其成为主流消费品这一现实问题,在绿色经济背景下,探讨零售商向负责绿色研发成本投入的制造商提供不同联合研发契约时的供应链均衡策略和协调问题。以零售商主导的双边垄断型绿色供应链为研究对象,在考虑消费者环保意识、产品绿色度水平、价格等多种因素影响需求的基础上,分别探讨批发价契约、成本分担契约和两部制契约对绿色产品需求、供应链成员利润及渠道利润的影响。结果表明,成本分担契约无法实现供应链成员利润的Pareta改进;一定条件下,两部制契约可以实现供应链成员利润的双赢,并提高绿色产品的市场需求。此外,虽然消费者环保意识的提高并不总是会带来绿色产品市场需求的增加,但却总是会使得绿色供应链的利润提高;并且较高的消费者环保意识将激励企业追求一个较低的绿色成本系数,从而促使企业积极进行绿色技术创新努力。In the context of a green economy,enterprises,as important participants in human social activities,must resort to green supply chain management practices under pressure of environmental regulation,environmental barriers to international trade,and increasing public awareness of environmental protection.In order to maintain a sustainable competitive advantage in the context of a green economy,many companies are trying to provide products that are more energy efficient and environmentally friendly than their traditional counterparts on the market.However,the improvement of a product’s“green”quality often requires significant investment into environmental research and development,coupled with the existence of the double-marginal effect of the supply chain.The price of green products in the market is often higher than that of their traditional counterparts,which has become one of the key factors hindering the progression of these products towards becoming mainstream consumer goods.This paper focuses on whether different contracts can improve the value of green products while improving the profit of supply chain members and their market demand,in the context of a green economy,and has important implications for the development of production enterprises and the entire green society.This paper takes the retailer-led bilateral monopoly green supply chain as the research object,uses relevant knowledge of game theory to construct a Starkberg game model between manufacturers and retailers,and discusses the retailers’cost of investment in responsible environmental research and development.Manufacturers offer strategies for balancing the supply chain and resolving coordination issues when different joint R&D contracts are available.First,on the basis of considering various factors such as consumer environmental awareness,product“green”level and price,the optimal situation and profit problem is analyzed under the centralized situation and wholesale price contract model.Moreover,the wholesale model is used as a refer
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.138.105.128