检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:范伟[1] 孙振宇[1] 孟祥宽[1] 任宇峰[1] FAN Wei;SUN Zhenyu;MENG Xiangkaun;REN Yufeng(Cardiothoracic Surgery, Beijing Renhe Hospital, Beijing 102600, China)
出 处:《标记免疫分析与临床》2020年第3期480-483,507,共5页Labeled Immunoassays and Clinical Medicine
基 金:北京市科委“首都临床特色应用研究”专项课题(编号:Z171100001017102)。
摘 要:目的研究非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者血清CEA、CYFRA21-1、VEGF、STK1及SF水平的诊断价值。方法选取2018年7月至2019年6月在我院收治的85例NSCLC患者为研究组,85例肺部良性疾病患者作为对照组以及85例健康体检者作为健康组,对比分析3组人群的CEA、CYFRA21-1、VEGF、STK1及SF水平,以及采用Logistic多因素回归分析与NSCLC疾病的关系,并联合检测CEA、CYFRA21-1、VEGF、STK1及SF水平判断NSCLC的诊断效能。结果研究组和对照组的血清CEA、CYFRA21-1、VEGF、STK1以及SF水平均显著高于健康组(P<0.05),且研究组的血清CEA、CYFRA21-1、VEGF、STK1以及SF水平均显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析结果显示血清CEA、CYFRA21-1、VEGF、STK1以及SF水平均是NSCLC疾病的独立危险因素。除灵敏度稍低于SF指标检测外,联合检测的灵敏度、特异性、约登指数及ROC曲线下面积均高于三者的单独检测,具有较好的诊断价值。结论采用CEA、CYFRA21-1、VEGF、STK1及SF水平的联合检测对NSCLC疾病具有较高诊断效能,能够比较方便、快捷、实时地发现高危人群,具有很好的临床参考价值。Objective To study the diagnostic value of serum CEA,CYFRA21-1,VEGF,STK1 and SF levels in patients with non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC).Methods 85 NSCLC patients admitted to our hospital from July,2018 to June,2019 were selected as the study group,while 85 patients with pulmonary benign diseases as the control group and 85 healthy people as the health group.The CEA,CYFRA21-1,VEGF,STK1 and SF levels of the three groups were compared,and the relationships between these three groups with NSCLC disease were analyzed by logistic multiple factor regression analysis.Also,the combined detection of CEA,CYFRA21-1,VEGF,STK1 and SF levels to determine the diagnostic efficacy of NSCLC was evaluated.Results The levels of CEA,CYFRA21-1,VEGF,STK1 and SF in the study group and the control group were significantly higher than those in the healthy group(P<0.05),and the levels of CEA,CYFRA21-1,VEGF,STK1 and SF in the study group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05).Logistic regression analysis showed that serum CEA,CYFRA21-1,VEGF,STK1 and SF levels were independent risk factors of NSCLC.In addition to the sensitivity which was slightly lower than SF index detection,the sensitivity,specificity,Jordan index and area under ROC curve of the combined detection were all higher than those of three individual detections,suggesting a better diagnostic value.Conclusion Combining CEA,CYFRA21-1,VEGF,STK1 and SF levels to diagnose NSCLC disease has a high detection efficiency.This method is convenient,fast and can find high-risk groups in real-time,which has a good clinical reference value.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.157