评价理论视阈下公诉人反问句的语用修辞功能及语调特征  

The Pragmatic Rhetorical Functions and Intonation Features of Prosecutors’Rhetorical Questions from the Perspective of Appraisal Theory

作　　者：陈海庆[1] 孙润妤 Chen Haiqing;Sun Runyu

机构地区：[1]大连理工大学外国语学院,辽宁大连116024

出　　处：《当代修辞学》2020年第2期82-95,共14页Contemporary Rhetoric

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“中国当代庭审话语语调表征及其信息效果研究”(项目编号:15BFX006)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：在庭审语境下,不同类型的反问句往往具有不同的语用修辞功能,它不仅可以表明说话人的态度意义,也在不同程度上反映出情感意义。本文根据评价理论的态度系统和焦点功能理论,以CCTV12《庭审现场》栏目庭审案件转写文本为语料,运用实证研究方法,并借助Praat语音分析软件和UAM Corpus Tool评价理论分析软件,对庭审话语公诉人反问句的类型、数量、语调因素和情感态度意义进行了统计和分析。结果表明,公诉人反问句类型主要包括:正反反问句、特指反问句和是非反问句,它们通过语调因素和态度情感特征表现出五大语用修辞功能,即确认责备、提醒警示、惊诧质疑、辩解驳斥及申辩求证。其中,申辩求证功能使用频率最高,且主要以是非反问句形式出现。It is in the context of court trial that different types of rhetorical questions have different pragmatic rhetorical functions,which not only indicate the speaker’s attitude,but also reflect his/her affect in different degrees.According to the Appraisal Theory and the Focus Information Function Theory,with the method of empirical research and the help of Praat and UAM Corpus Tool,this paper analyzes the type,quantity,intonation,affect and attitude of the rhetorical questions used by prosecutors in courtroom discourses,which are transferred from the program The Scene of Trial in CCTV12.It is found that there are three kinds of prosecutor’s rhetorical questions in total,which are,the rhetorical A-not-A questions,the rhetorical Wh-questions and the rhetorical YesNo questions.They manifest five pragmatic rhetorical functions by means of intonation,attitude and affect factors and features,i.e.,to confirm and blame,to remind and warn,to be amazed and question,to justify and refute,and to defend and prove.Moreover,the function of defending and proving is used most frequently.

关 键 词：评价理论 庭审话语 反问句 公诉人 语用修辞功能 语调特征 

分 类 号：H146.3[语言文字—汉语]