情况判决的适用标准  

Standards of Application of Situational Judgment

作　　者：马艳 Ma Yan(Guanghua Law School of Zhejiang University,Hangzhou Zhejiang 310008;School of Public Administration of Guizhou University,Guizhou Guiyang 550025)

机构地区：[1]浙江大学光华法学院,浙江杭州310008 [2]贵州大学公共管理学院,贵州贵阳550025

出　　处：《行政法学研究》2020年第2期150-160,共11页ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW

摘　　要：情况判决是在尊重既成事实的基础上,基于对"公益"的保护,在利益衡量下的非常态判决。在实际适用中,存在情况判决与其他确认判决类型混为一用、相关核心概念的范畴呈扩展趋势及救济手段覆盖率低等情形。究其原因,在于新《行政诉讼法》对情况判决条文用词的演变及欠缺对"私益"范畴保护的规定。为有效发挥情况判决的作用,应将"公益"的单方认定变为多方的责任分配,重大损害的认定必须考虑相关因素及在诉讼中增加"沟通协议"环节。Situational judgment is an abnormal judgment based on respect for the fait and protection of public welfare.In practical application, the case judgment has evolved into "public interst" priority, neglecting the due status of "private interest", and it is unclear that administrative acts violate the law to reach the revocation standard.The loss of the measurement of "public interst" and "private interest" interests and the coverage of relief measures are low.The reason is that the new Administrative Procedure Law lacks the protection of "private interest" and the evolution of the wording of the provisions of the situational judgment.In order to effectively play the role the situational judgment, the determination of "public interst" should be changed into the allocation of responsibilities among different parties.The determination of major damage must consider relevant factors and add the link of "communication agreement" in litigation.

关 键 词：情况判决 公益 私益 适用标准 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]