生态环境损害修复责任的性质辨析  

作　　者：胡桂林 贾爱玲[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江农林大学,浙江杭州311300

出　　处：《环境保护与循环经济》2020年第2期79-82,共4页environmental protection and circular economy

摘　　要：生态环境损害赔偿制度实施以来,有关修复责任的理论探讨出现了不同的观点。从生态环境损害修复的对象、责任主体以及法律依据出发考量,理论界有着不同的看法。但伴随着相关权威司法解释的出台以及从最新的立法动向得知,生态环境损害修复责任的性质已愈加明晰。最高法已将“修复生态环境”作为生态环境损害赔偿责任的实现方式,而民法典草案侵权责任编也已对生态环境损害的修复做出了相关规定。以此为基础,探讨生态环境损害修复责任的理论内涵、修复责任的目的,以期明确生态环境损害修复的责任性质。Since the implementation of the compensation system for ecological environmental damage,different views have emerged on the theoretical discussion of the responsibility for restoration.From the perspective of the object of ecological damage repair,the subject of responsibility and the legal basis,the theoretical circle has different views.However,with the introduction of relevant authoritative judicial interpretations and the latest legislative trends,the nature of the responsibility for the restoration of ecological environment damage has become clearer.The Supreme Law has adopted the“remediation of the ecological environment”as the realization of the responsibility for compensation for ecological environmental damage,and the infringement liability of the draft Civil Code has also made relevant provisions on the restoration of ecological environmental damage.On this basis,the theoretical connotation of the responsibility for ecological environment damage restoration and the purpose of restoration responsibility are discussed in order to clarify the nature of the responsibility.

关 键 词：生态环境损害修复 修复责任 责任性质 

分 类 号：X171.4[环境科学与工程—环境科学]