检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张曾莲[1] 原亚男 ZHANG Zeng-lian;YUAN Ya-nan(Donlinks School of Economics and Management,University of Science and Technology,Beijing 100083,China;School of Business,Beijing Wuzi University,Beijing 101149,China)
机构地区:[1]北京科技大学东凌经济管理学院,北京100083 [2]北京物资学院商学院,北京101149
出 处:《华东经济管理》2020年第5期42-50,共9页East China Economic Management
基 金:北京市自然科学基金项目“北京市自科基金资助管理绩效的评价、动因及对区域创新的贡献研究”(9182011)。
摘 要:文章以2013-2018年沪深两市上市公司参与PPP(政府与社会资本合作,Private-Public-Partnership)进行基础设施建设项目的企业为样本,通过PSM-DID检验发现,参与PPP项目在一定程度上降低了上市公司的创新;同时,参与PPP项目的数量越多,降低上市公司创新的幅度越大;较之民营企业,国有企业创新挤出效应更明显。因此,既要鼓励民营企业积极参与PPP项目,也要激发参与PPP项目的国有企业的创新水平。This paper takes the listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen that participated in PPP(Government-Social Capital Cooperation,Private-Public-Partnership)infrastructure construction projects from 2013 to 2018 as samples.Through PSM-DID test,it is found that participation in PPP projects can reduce the innovation of listed companies to a certain extent;at the same time,the more the number of PPP projects,the greater the extent of reducing the innovation of listed companies;compared with private enterprises,the innovation crowding-out effect of state-owned enterprises is more obvious.Therefore,we should not only encourage private enterprises to participate in PPP projects,but also stimu late the innovation level of state-owned enterprises participating in PPP projects.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28