检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈国鹰 孙进书 张爱国[1] 张义明[1] Chen Guoying;Sun Jinshu;Zhang Aiguo;Zhang Yiming(School of Economics and Management,Hebei University of Technology,Tianjin 300401,China)
出 处:《科技进步与对策》2020年第5期95-103,共9页Science & Technology Progress and Policy
基 金:国家科技重大专项项目(2018ZX07110-007)。
摘 要:以往有关联盟绩效的研究很少关注企业动机通过权力配置对绩效的多重影响,以及不同动机和权力配置的影响差异。以资源依赖理论和议价能力理论为基础,以中国245家水环境治理企业为样本,研究小企业加入联盟的动机通过感知位置权力与能力权力的配置,对非对称联盟创新绩效和财务绩效的联合效应。结果表明,战略动机通过感知权利互补和平衡促进技术创新;成本动机通过感知权利互补影响财务绩效,但无法通过感知权利平衡影响财务绩效。Previous studies on alliance performance have paid little attention on the multiple impacts of power allocation on alliance performance based on specific motivation,and whether the impacts are similar or different.Based on the theory of resource dependence and bargaining power,taking 245 water environmental governance enterprises in China as samples,studies the joint effect of small firms'motivation to join the alliance on innovation performance and financial performance of asymmetric alliance through the allocation of perceived position power and capacity power.Empirical research shows that strategic motivation can achieve technological innovation through perceived power complementarity and balance,cost motivation can affect financial performance through perceived power complementarity,but not through perceived power balance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.80.46