不同时机应用泪道探通术治疗新生儿泪囊炎的疗效对比  

Comparison of Effects of Lacrimal Passage Probing Performed at Different Times on Neonatal Dacryocystitis

作　　者：凌博[1] 陈水生[1] 戚翠萍 LING Bo;CHEN Shui-sheng;QI Cui-ping(Department of Ophthalmology,Zhanjiang Central People’s Hospital,Zhanjiang 524045,China)

机构地区：[1]湛江中心人民医院眼科,广东湛江524045

出　　处：《实用临床医学（江西）》2020年第1期67-69,共3页Practical Clinical Medicine

摘　　要：目的探讨不同时机应用泪道探通术治疗新生儿泪囊炎的疗效。方法以接受泪道探通术治疗的100例(138眼)新生儿泪囊炎患者为研究对象,根据患儿年龄进行分组,A组45例(3~6个月,56眼),B组32例(7~10个月,42眼),C组23例(10个月以上,30眼),对比3组的治疗效果和不良反应。结果A组、B组和C组治疗总有效率分别为98.21%、85.71%和83.33%,A组治疗总有效率高于B组和C组(均P<0.05),B组和C组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);A组、B组和C组不良反应发生率分别为1.79%、4.76%和6.67%,组间比较差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论新生儿泪囊炎实施泪道探通术的治疗时机是出生6个月内。Objective To investigate the effects of lacrimal passage probing performed at different times on neonatal dacryocystitis.Methods One hundred cases of neonatal dacryocystitis(138 eyes)receiving lacrimal passage probing were divided into three groups:group A(3-6 months old,45 cases,56 eyes),group B(7-10 months old,32 cases,42 eyes),and group C(more than 10 months old,23 case,30 eyes).Curative effects and adverse reactions were compared among the three groups.Results The total effective rate in group A(98.21%)was higher than that in group B(85.71%)or group C(83.33%)(P<0.05).The difference was not significant between group C and group B(P>0.05).In addition,there were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse reactions among group A(1.79%),group B(4.76%)and group C(6.67%)(P>0.05).Conclusion The timing of lacrimal passage probing for neonatal dacryocystitis is within 6 months of birth.

关 键 词：泪道探通术 新生儿 泪囊炎 治疗时机 疗效 

分 类 号：R777.2[医药卫生—眼科]