大学生行为抑制量表信效度再检验  

Re-examination of Reliabilities and Validities of Behavior Inhibition Scale for University Students

作　　者：晏宁 李英 罗浩 曾美英[4] Yan Ning;Li Ying;Luo Hao;Zeng Meiying(Psychological Services Center,Beijing Union University,Beijing 100101,China;Beijing Experimental School(Haidian),Beijing 100037,China;ShanXi Athletic Rehabilitation Base,Taiyuan 030021,China;Teachers’College of Beijing Union University,Beijing 100011,China)

机构地区：[1]北京联合大学心理素质教育中心,北京100101 [2]北京实验学校(海淀),北京100037 [3]山西省体育运动康复基地,太原030021 [4]北京联合大学师范学院,北京100011

出　　处：《北京联合大学学报》2020年第2期50-55,共6页Journal of Beijing Union University

基　　金：北京社会心理研究所委托项目《大学生网络攻击与行为抑制的关系研究》。

摘　　要：目的:重新检验大学生行为抑制量表的信效度,同时评估其交叉效度;方法:使用大学生行为抑制量表、中文网络成瘾量表、简易应对方式量表和社交回避及苦恼量表调查了来自11所高校的1330名大学生,分析其同质性信度、重测信度、构想效度、效标效度、众知群体效度,并评估其交叉效度。结果:各分量表克隆巴赫α介于0.60~0.86,间隔3周的重测信度介于0.81~0.90;EFA得到6个因素,与量表编制的理论构想一致;与积极应对和消极应对的相关分别为-0.22和0.25,支持其区分效度;与网络成瘾、社交回避和社交苦恼的相关分别为0.33、0.48和0.42,支持其效标效度;男生对求助的抑制多于女生(F=12.98,P<0.01),对自信心的抑制则少于女生(F=16.08,P<0.01);学历层次越高,对自信心(F=4.56,P<0.05)和支配(F=7.77,P<0.01)的抑制越多;对求助(F=4.49,P<0.05)、支配(F=5.42,P<0.05)、自信心(F=8.44,P<0.01)和拒绝(F=10.55,P<0.01)的抑制存在显著的性别、学历层次交互作用;支持其众知群体效度。讨论:个别测量条目存在从属维度有误、区分度较低和反向计分有误等问题,未来使用中须加以注意。Objective:To re-examine reliability and validity of the Behavioral Inhibition Scale for college students,and evaluate its cross validation.Methods:1330 students from 11 universities or colleges were investigated with the Behavior Inhibition Scale for college students,Chinese Internet Addiction Scale’s revision(CIAS-R),Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire,Social Avoidance and Distress Scale.The homogeneity reliability,test-retest reliability,construct validity,criterion-related validity and known groups validity of the Behavior Inhibition Scale for college students were analyzed,and then its cross validity was evaluated.Results:Cronbach’sα=0.60~0.86,test-retest reliability at 3 weeks interval=0.81~0.90.Six factors were obtained by EFA,which were consistent with the theoretical conception of the scale.The correlation coefficients between the total score of behavioral inhibition scale and positive and negative coping were-0.22 and 0.25,respectively,which supported the discriminant validity of the scale.The correlation coefficient between behavior inhibition and CIAS-R,Social Avoidance and Distress was 0.33,0.48 and 0.42,respectively,which supported the criterion-related validity of the scale.Males were more inhibited than females in seeking help behavior(F=12.98,P<0.01),less inhibited than females in self-confidence(F=16.08,P<0.01),and the higher the education level,the more inhibition in self-confidence(F=4.56,P<0.05)and domination(F=7.77,P<0.01),and there was significant interaction between gender and education level in the inhibition of help seeking,domination,self-confidence and rejection,which supports the known groups validity of the scale.Discussion:Some items have some problems,such as wrong subordination dimension,low discrimination and wrong reverse-scoring,which should be paid attention to in the future.

关 键 词：行为抑制 信度 效度 网络成瘾 应对方式 社交回避 社交苦恼 

分 类 号：B844[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]