检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:童之伟 TONG Zhiwei
机构地区:[1]湖北民族大学法学院
出 处:《法学评论》2020年第2期1-10,共10页Law Review
基 金:国家社科基金一般项目“地方立法权扩容对民族自治地方立法的影响及对策研究”(项目编号:17BMZ004)成果。
摘 要:权利义务的核心范畴地位获得了法理学教材体系的普遍认同,但宪法学和公法学教材对它的认同度不高。近二十年来,法理学者在研究现实法律问题、甚至做全局性论述的时候,逐渐形成了放弃权利义务中心,代之以权利权力中心的选择倾向。新倾向的出现对于我国着力认识权力、合理配置权力,以及对权力的合理运用和制约监督,都有现实意义。本文作者并不赞成以权利权力作为法学的核心范畴,而是主张把反映和记录人们对权利权力共同体的认识的法权概念作为法学的核心范畴。Status of the core category of rights and duty has been generally recognized by the jurisprudence textbook system,but constitutional and public law textbooks are not highly recognized.In the past two decades,jurists have gradually formed the choice tendency of abandoning the center of rights and duty while focusing on rights and powers when studying realistic legal issues and even making general discussions.The emergence of new trends has practical significance for our country’s efforts to understand power,rationally allocate power,and the reasonable use and restriction of power.The author of this paper does not support taking the right and power as the core category of jurisprudence,but advocates that the concept of"faquan"that reflects and records people’s knowledge of the right-power unified entity shall be the core category of jurisprudence.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28