论《两岸司法互助协议》在台湾地区的实施--以台湾方面有关区际刑事规定为例  

On Enforcement of Cross-Strait Joint Crime-Fighting and Mutual Legal Assistance Agreement in Taiwan Region: Focusing on Inter-Regional Criminal Statutes and Regulations

作　　者：刘文戈 滕若芊 Liu Wenge;Teng Ruoqian(Department of law,Xiamen University Graduate Institute for Taiwan Studies;Xiamen University Graduate Institute for Taiwan Studies)

机构地区：[1]厦门大学台湾研究院法律研究所

出　　处：《台海研究》2020年第1期72-83,共12页Cross-Taiwan Strait Studies

摘　　要：《两岸司法互助协议》的司法适用存在争议,其立法适用载体"己方规定"是两岸司法互助实践的主要依据。《两岸司法互助协议》在台湾地区的"立法适用"有两条路径,包括了"法律"、"命令"等不同形式。台湾地区现行规范体系对《两岸司法互助协议》起到提供基准、限制约束的作用,而创制型"立法"对《两岸司法互助协议》起到发展完善的作用。"法律"位阶的规定以协议明定的司法互助事项为主,警务合作、人道关怀等事项多规定为"命令"位阶。"己方规定"为司法互助提供了明确的依据,但在落实过程中仍面临来自制度体系的阻碍、来自"准用"条款的政治风险、部分事项面临违反"法律保留原则"质疑、单方规定架空协议等问题。未来应更加重视"己方规定"对于完善两岸司法互助制度的意义。The judicial enforcement of Cross-Strait Joint Crime-Fighting and Mutual Legal Assistance Agreement is of controversial,the legislative enforcement of the agreement needs to be concerned,and local rules are the main basis for the practice of cross-strait mutual legal assistance.There are two ways for legislative enforcement in Taiwan region,including different forms such as statutes and regulations.The current statutes and regulations provide standards and restricts acts for the Agreement,while the newly statutes and regulations develop the Agreement.The statutes are mainly about matters which specified in the agreement,while the regulations are mainly about matters about police cooperation and humanitarian issues.The local rules provide clear basis for mutual legal assistance,but in the process of enforcement,it still faces obstacles from the legal system,political risks,problems in violating the Vorbehalt des Gesetzes(principle of legal reservation) and overhead the Agreement.In the future,more attention should be placed to the local rules for improving the cross-strait mutual legal assistance system.

关 键 词：两岸司法互助 立法适用 “己方规定” 台湾地区 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学] D926[政治法律—法学]