检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周杨 唐天润 王雅欣 杨连丰 孙超[1] 王晶艳[1] 吴大明[1,2] ZHOU Yang;TANG Tianrun;WANG Yaxin;YANG Lianfeng;SUN Chao;WANG Jingyan;WU Daming(Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases,Nanjing Medical University;Department of Radiology,Department of Endodontics,the Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing 210029,China)
机构地区:[1]南京医科大学口腔疾病研究江苏省重点实验室,南京医科大学附属口腔医院影像科,江苏南京210029 [2]南京医科大学附属口腔医院牙体牙髓病科,江苏南京210029
出 处:《口腔医学》2020年第3期223-226,共4页Stomatology
基 金:江苏省卫生计生委科研课题(H2017050)。
摘 要:目的通过比较平行和分角线投照数字根尖片(digital periapical radiographs,DPR)测量种植体长度和直径的准确性,为DPR评价种植体周围骨组织水平提供参考。方法160名患者210颗种植体,按随机数字表法分为平行投照组(80例患者,98颗种植体)和分角线投照组(80例患者,112颗种植体),术后即刻拍摄DPR。利用软件SOPRO Imaging 2.20盲法测量DPR上种植体的直径和长度,然后与种植体实际值比较,利用SPSS软件进行两元方差分析和LSD多重比较,评价两种投照DPR测量的准确性。结果平行投照DPR测量直径和长度与种植体实际值的差值分别为(0.14±0.10)mm、(0.20±0.15)mm,水平和垂直放大倍率分别为1.58%、2.13%;分角线投照DPR测量直径和长度与种植体实际值的差值分别为(0.37±0.22)mm、(1.04±0.47)mm,水平和垂直放大倍率分别为3.90%、10.65%。平行投照DPR测量种植体长度和直径的准确性均优于分角线投照DPR(P<0.05)。结论平行投照DPR能更准确地测量种植体的直径和长度,提示利用平行投照DPR能更准确地评价种植体周围的骨组织水平。Objective To evaluate the accuracy of linear measurements of dental implants obtained from digital periapical radiographs(DPR)by the paralleling and bisecting-angle technique,and provide references for DPR in peri-implant bone tissue assessment.Methods One hundred and sixty patients with 210 implants were divided into two groups randomly:paralleling technique group(80 patients with 98 implants)and bisecting-angle technique group(80 patients with 112 implants).DPRs were taken after implant placement immediately and the diameter and length of implants on DPRs were measured using SOPRO Imaging 2.20 software by blind method.Then the measurements were compared with the actual size of the implants.SPSS software was used to conduct binary analysis of variance and LSD multiple comparison to obtain the level of significance.And the accuracy of two measurement methods was evaluated.Results In the paralleling group,the mean differences between measurements and actual values were(0.14±0.10)mm in diameter and(0.20±0.15)mm in length,with the magnification of 1.58%in horizontal direction and 2.13%in vertical direction.In the bisecting-angle group,the mean differences were(0.37±0.22)mm in diameter and(1.04±0.47)mm in length,while the horizontal and vertical magnification were 3.90%and 10.65%respectively.Paralleling DPR showed a better accuracy than bisecting-angle DPR in measuring the diameter and length of implants(P<0.05).Conclusion Paralleling DPR can obtain a more precise measurement of the diameter and length of the implants,which may be considered as a clinically reliable radiographic examination for implant treatment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.100.3