检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:殷忠平[1] 张彬[1] 王铁瑛[1] 果利[1] 何苗[1] 许艳华[2] Zhong-ping Yin;Bin Zhang;Tie-ying Wang;Li Guo;Miao He;Yan-hua Xu(Depatment of Stomatology,Daqing Longnan Hospital(The Fifth Subsidiary Hospital of Qiqihar Medical College),Daqing,Heilongjiang 163453,China;Depatment of Orthodontics,The Affiliated Stomatology Hospital of Kunming Medical University,Kunming,Yunnan 650031,China)
机构地区:[1]齐齐哈尔医学院第五附属医院(大庆龙南医院)口腔科,黑龙江大庆163453 [2]昆明医科大学附属口腔医院口腔正畸科,云南昆明650031
出 处:《中国现代医学杂志》2020年第7期77-81,共5页China Journal of Modern Medicine
基 金:国家自然科学基金(No:81760193)。
摘 要:目的评估复合树脂高强纤维(GFRCR)间隙保持器力学性能及临床应用疗效。方法应用万能材料试验机测量GFRCR和带环丝圈式间隙保持器的最大抗剪切力值;临床选双侧下颌第二乳磨牙均缺失需要缺隙保持患儿43例,一侧用GFRCR间隙保持器(GFRCR组),对侧用带环丝圈式间隙保持器(带环丝圈组),观察比较两组临床操作时间和患者主观疼痛程度,以及配戴1、3、6和12个月后2种间隙保持器的成功率。结果两组间隙保持器最大抗剪切力比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);GFRCR组临床操作时间短于带环丝圈组(P<0.05);GFRCR组患者基本无疼痛,主观舒适程度优于带环丝圈组(P<0.05);第1、3和6个月配戴成功率两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),12月配戴成功率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),GFRCR组低于带环丝圈组。结论2种间隙保持器具有可比拟的机械强度;GFRCR间隙保持器操作省时、简单、舒适、疼痛小、短期疗效优。Objective To compare the mechanical properties and the clinical application of the glass fiber–reinforced composite resin(GFRCR)space maintainer with the band-and-loop space maintainer.Methods The maximum shear resistance of GFRCR space maintainer and traditional band-and-loop space maintainer was tested by universal material testing machine.43 children with premature loss of bilateral mandibular deciduous second molars were included into this study.GFRCR space maintainers were used on one side and traditional band-and-loop space maintainers were adopted on the other side of the same participant.Clinical operation time,subjective comfort levels of patients were assessed.The success rate was further estimated 1,3,6 and 12 months after wearing retainers.Results There was no significant difference in maximum shear strength between these two space retainers(P>0.05);Clinical operation time was less and patient subjective comfort was better in GFRCR group than that of band-andloop group(P<0.05).The success rate of the GFRCR group was lower 1,3,6 and 12 months after wearing these two retainers,but only the difference 12 months later was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The mechanical strength was comparable between these two space retainers.Application of GFRCR space retainer can shorten the clinical operation time and improve patient subjective comfort.And its short-term success rate is comparable to band-and-loop space maintainer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249