写作的伦理:民族悖论与奈保尔的后殖民文学创作  

The Ethics of Writing: National Nonsense and V. S. Naipaul’s Postcolonial Writings

作　　者：皮宾燕[1,2] 张洪兵 Pi Binyan;Zhang Hongbing(Central China Normal University,Wuhan,China,430079;Chinese at Fayetteville State University,USA)

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学外语学院 [2]华中师范大学文学院 [3]美国菲耶维尔州立大学语言文化与交流系

出　　处：《当代外国文学》2020年第1期105-110,共6页Contemporary Foreign Literature

摘　　要：本文以诺贝尔文学获奖者奈保尔的两部作品《模仿者》和《在自由的国度》为研究文本,探讨作家如何再现并反思民族悖论的历史经验,以及他在写作中如何与殖民帝国和现代民族国家都保持一种伦理距离。文章指出,奈保尔的写作伦理建立在对后殖民时代人们的生存状态与欲望的真实再现的基础上,它挑战了殖民帝国和民族国家的意识形态与文化。This paper examines two writings by the Nobel Prize winner V.S.Naipaul:The Mimic Men(1969)and In a Free State(1984).In particular,it studies how Naipaul reflects on the historical experiences of national nonsense—the seemingly contradictory existence of transnationality in nationality—and how he manages in his writings to keep an ethical distance from both the colonial empires and the nation-states in the postcolonial world.His ethics of writing is based on an imperative to represent the existence and desire of people in the postcolonial world,furthermore it challenges the ideologies and cultures of both the colonial empires and the nation-states.

关 键 词：殖民帝国 民族悖论 后殖民主义 写作伦理 

分 类 号：I561.074[文学—其他各国文学]