前牙美学评估表和心理干预对前牙美学修复患者满意度的影响  

Influence of Anterior Esthetic Evaluation Form and Psychological Intervention on Patients' Satisfaction of Anterior Esthetic Restorations

作　　者：何亚兰 岳进 宋林林[2] 于文滔 张华林[1] HE Yalan;YUE Jin;SONG Linlin;YU Wentao;ZHANG Hualin(School of Stomatology,Ningxia Medical University,Yinchuan750004,China;Hospital of Stomatology,General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University,Yinchuan750004,China)

机构地区：[1]宁夏医科大学口腔医学院,银川750004 [2]宁夏医科大学总医院口腔医院,银川750004

出　　处：《宁夏医科大学学报》2020年第1期95-99,共5页Journal of Ningxia Medical University

基　　金：宁夏回族自治区2017年高等学校本科教学质量与教学改革工程项目——重点专业子项目(宁教高[2017]68号)。

摘　　要：目的探讨并比较应用前牙美学评估表和(或)心理干预对前牙美学修复患者修复后总体满意度的影响。方法选取在2018年1月至2018年9月期间于宁夏医科大学总医院口腔医院修复科行上前牙全瓷美学修复的140例患者,随机分为A、B、C、D组,每组35例。A组采用前牙美学修复的方式进行修复,B组在前牙美学修复的过程中加入心理干预,C组在前牙美学修复的过程中结合应用前牙美学评估表,D组则在前牙美学修复过程中结合应用前牙美学评估表以及心理干预。修复治疗结束两周后预约患者复诊并进行满意度评价。结果四组患者的总体满意度得分均>28分,故均获得了较高的满意度;四组在总体满意度方面的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),且B、C、D组总体满意度得分均高于A组(P均<0.05),D组总体满意度高于C组(P<0.05)。结论在前牙美学修复中,应用心理干预或前牙美学评估表均有助于提高患者修复后总体满意度,且两者结合应用后患者满意度最佳。Objective This study aims to explore and compare the impact of the application of anterior aesthetic evaluation form and psychological intervention on the satisfaction of patients with anterior aesthetic restoration.Methods Totally 140 cases of patients with anterior aesthetic restorations in the department of Prosthodontics of the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University Affiliated Stomatology Hospital from January 2018 to September 2018 were selected.They were divided into groups A,B,C and D randomly,with 35 cases in each group.Group A was repaired by anterior aesthetic restoration.Group B was treated with anterior aesthetic restoration combined with psychological intervention.Group C was treated with anterior aesthetic restoration combined with anterior aesthetic evaluation form.Group D was combined with the application of anterior aesthetic evaluation form and psychological intervention in the anterior aesthetic restoration process.Two weeks after the end of the repair treatment,the patient was scheduled to be re-diagnosed and evaluated for satisfaction.Results The overall satisfaction scores of the four groups A,B,C,and D were all greater than 28 points,so they all achieved higher satisfaction.Differences in overall satisfaction between group A,B,C,and D were statistically significant(P<0.05).The overall satisfaction scores of groups B,C,and D were higher than that of group A(P all<0.05).Overall satisfaction of group D was higher than that of group C(P<0.05).Conclusion In the anterior aesthetic restoration,the application of psychological intervention or anterior aesthetic evaluation form can help improve the overall satisfaction of patients after repair,and the patient satisfaction was the best after the combination of the two.

关 键 词：前牙美学修复 牙科焦虑症 心理干预 前牙美学评估表 满意度 

分 类 号：R783[医药卫生—口腔医学]