检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李冰[1] 杜楠华 苗力[1] Li Bing;Du Nanhua;Miao Li(School of Architecture&Fine Arts,Dalian University of Technology,Dalian Liaoning 116024,China)
机构地区:[1]大连理工大学建筑与艺术学院,辽宁大连116024
出 处:《城市建筑》2020年第5期7-10,共4页Urbanism and Architecture
基 金:辽宁省社会科学规划基金项目(L19BBZS002)。
摘 要:城市形态的历时性演变是城市形态学研究的重点之一,道路系统的研究是城市形态的基本骨架,但平面分析很难读出形态之外的街道活力状况。空间句法理论能够从几何学量化研究导出城市道路的可达性潜力,与其真实活力具有相当的吻合度,是城市形态学研究的重要拓展。本文以盖州古城为例,对其不同历史时期的道路系统进行形态学量化研究,解读整合度、选择度、协同度三个句法变量,将所得论断与史料查询及实地调研信息进行校核,从而总结出古城活力中心北移、街道系统逐步完善、“超尺度”区域增加等演变特征。The diachronic evolution of urban morphology is one of the focuses of urban morphology research.The analysis on street systems is the basic framework of urban morphology research,but it is difficult to read the vitality of streets outside of morphology.Space syntax theory can derive the accessibility potential of street system from the quantitative research of geometry,and has a good fitness with its real vitality,which is an important extension of urban morphology research.Taking the ancient city of Gaizhou as an example,this paper conducts morphological quantitative research on its street system in different historical periods,interprets three syntactic variables of integration,choice and synergy,and then verifies the obtained conclusions by historical data inquiry and field investigation information.In this way,some characteristics are summarized,such as the northward shift of the vitality center,the gradual improvement of the street system,and the increase of“over-scale”urban areas.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.179