敌意归因问卷中文版测量学分析及初步应用  

Psychometric Analysis of Assessment of Intent Attributions for Ambiguous Provocation Situations in Chinese Children and Adolescents

作　　者：张洁 潘斌[1] 陈亮[1] 李腾飞[1] 张文新[1] ZHANG Jie;PAN Bin;CHEN Liang;LI Teng-fei;ZHANG Wen-xin(School of Psychology,Shandong Normal University,Jinan 250014,China)

机构地区：[1]山东师范大学心理学院,济南250014

出　　处：《中国临床心理学杂志》2020年第2期306-310,408,共6页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目(16CSH053)。

摘　　要：目的:修订适合中国文化背景下使用的儿童青少年敌意归因问卷。方法:基于Nelson等修订的中文版敌意归因假设故事情境问卷对3215名3-8年级学生进行问卷调查。结果:验证性因素分析结果表明工具型-关系型敌意归因二因素模型拟合良好(χ^2=141.45, df=53, CFI=0.989, TLI=0.986, RMSEA=0.03),与原问卷因子结构一致。工具型敌意归因和关系型敌意归因的Cronbach’sα系数分别为0.76和0.77。工具型敌意归因显著正向预测身体攻击,关系型敌意归因显著正向预测关系攻击,敌意归因与攻击行为的联系具有情境特异性。结论:敌意归因问卷在中国儿童青少年群体中具有良好的信效度。Objective: The present study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the assessment of hostile of intent among Chinese children and adolescents. Methods: The Chinese version of"Assessment of Intent Attributions for Ambiguous Provocation Situations"(AIAAPS-C) was administrated to 3215 Grade 3-8 students. Results: Both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses lent supports to the structure validity of the AIAAPS-C measure(χ^2=141.45, df=53, CFI=0.989, TLI=0.986, RMSEA=0.03). Both the instrumental and relational subscales showed acceptable reliabilities. Children’s Instrumental intent attribution was linked to physical aggression, while their relational intent attribution was predictive of relational aggression, providing evidence for the type-specific hypothesis regarding the associations between intent attribution and aggression. Conclusion: The AIAAPS-C measure turns out to be valid and reliable in assessing intent attributions for ambiguous provocation situations among Chinese children and adolescents.

关 键 词：敌意归因 信度 效度 测量等值性 

分 类 号：R395.1[哲学宗教—心理学]