体育人类学的理论基础、研究方法及界限——范可教授体育人类学思索访谈录  

Theoretical Basis,Research Methods and Boundaries of Sports Anthropology--Interview with Professor Fan Ke on Sports Anthropology

作　　者：范娟娟 王水泉[2] FAN Juanjuan;WANG Shuiquar(Department of Physical Education,Yancheng Institute of Technology,Yancheng 224000,China;Col lege of Physical Education and Health Sciences,Zhejiang Normal University,Jinhua 321004,China)

机构地区：[1]盐城工学院体育教学部,盐城224000 [2]浙江师范大学体育与健康科学学院,金华321004

出　　处：《体育与科学》2020年第2期14-19,30,共7页Sports & Science

基　　金：2016年度国家社科基金一般项目“体育学体系中身体知的价值及传承机制研究”,项目号:16BTY006;2018年江苏省教育科学“十三五”规划课题,项目号:T-a/2018/03。

摘　　要：围绕体育人类学定位不明等问题,对南京大学人类学研究所教授范可进行学术访谈。对此,他从体育人类学的学科体系与理论基础、研究对象及方法、可能性与界限等方面进行了解答。他认为,体育人类学的研究范围非常宽广,不仅涉及民族传统体育领域,还能应用于与现代体育有关的体育产业、体育伦理、体育治理、性别等问题;田野工作为人类学的标志性方法,但调查过程中不应拘泥于固定程序,还应多留意意想不到的状况,且交流为田野工作成功的保障;体育人类学目前尚难成为一个独立学科,更为实际的做法是把其看作体育学与人类学之间的一个交叉领域。Focusing on issues such as the unknown position of sports anthropology,an academic interview was held with Professor Fan Ke of the Institute of Anthropology of Nanjing University.In this regard,he answered from the aspects of the discipline system and theoretical basis of sports anthropology,research objects and methods,possibilities and boundaries.His views are as follows.Firstly,the research scope of sports anthropology is very broad.It not only involves the field of national traditional sports,but also can be applied to sports industrialization,sports ethics,sports governance,gender and other issues related to modern sports.Sec-ondly,fieldwork is an iconic method of anthropology,but during the investigation,we should not stick to fixed procedures,we should pay more attention to unexpected situations,and exchanges guarantee the success of fieldwork.Thirdly,at present,sports anthropology is difficult to become an independent discipline.More practically,it is regarded as a cross field between sports and anthropology.

关 键 词：民族传统体育 现代体育 田野工作 交叉领域 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]