构建我国民事诉讼诉答规范的设想  

The Tentative Ideas of Constructing China’s Civil Pleading Standards

作　　者：邱星美[1] QIU Xing-mei(Civil,Commercial and Economic Law School,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100053,China)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学民商经济法学院,北京100053

出　　处：《太原学院学报（社会科学版）》2020年第1期54-63,共10页Journal of Taiyuan University(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：我国民事诉讼诉答文书缺乏具体规范要求,当事人或者代理律师书写诉答文书颇具任意性,诉答文书的补充、修改缺乏规范约束以致诉答颇具流动性,被告或被上诉人不提供答辩状很普遍,法院也并不要求提供,使民事诉讼审前程序功能受限,庭审效率受影响,当事人程序公平权利受损,与近几十年的司法改革、诉讼程序规范的改进脱节。国外的诉答程序、诉答状规范具有参考价值,值得我们借鉴。我们应当改革现状,建立诉答有效的文书规范,提高审判效率,保障当事人的公平程序权利,保障裁判质量。The plea and reply documents written by the party or attorney are rather arbitrary due to lack of specific standards in China,which results in a superficial procedure.It is common for the defendant or the appellant not to provide a statement of defence,which is not required by the court.The function of civil litigation pretrial procedure is thus limited and trials become inefficient.The procedure rights of the parties are harmed,and the quality of the court’s judgement constrained,which is inconsistent with the judicial reforming and pleading specifying.Pleading procedure and standards in foreign countries are mature and could be referred to.We should reform and improve judicial efficiency by establishing pleading documents standardization and specification,and thus the fairness of procedural rights and quality of judgment can be safeguarded.

关 键 词：诉答文书 诉答文书功能 诉答规范 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]