义务观念的跨语境实践:1949-2019——以法律义务概念为中心的批判性考察  

Cross-context Practice of the Conception of Obligation:1949-2019--A Critical Investigation Based on the Concepts of Legal Obligation

作　　者：王荣余 WANG Rong-yu(School of Administrative Law,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学行政法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《太原理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第1期30-37,共8页Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目“中国法理学研究70年回理与评析”(19AFX002);西南政法大学科研创新项目“事实与规范:权利泛化研究”(2019XZXS-017)。

摘　　要：自新中国成立以来,义务观念经历了从"义务即制裁"到"义务即不利"再到"义务即应当"的演进脉络,其侧重点分别在于:对必为性的强调、两种义务概念的杂糅、适应权利主张,以及对社会评价之基础的强调。这一演变内在地折射出法学研究"从法学之外到法学之内"逐步理性化、自主化的特征,并伴随着对个人权利基础的反思。然而,现有义务研究仍存在诸多不足,有必要进一步"认真对待义务"。Since the founding of People’s Republic of China,the conception of obligation has experienced a general evolution from"Sanction"to"Disadvantage"and to"Ought to". The key points respectively lie in emphasizing the necessity,a mixture of two obligation concepts,the claim of adaptive rights,as well as focusing on the basis of social evaluation. The general evolution of the conception of obligation reflects the features of gradual rationalization and independence from"outside the law"to"within the law"in legal research,which accompanies the reflections on the basis of the individual rights. Because there still exist some inadequate research in the work of obligation study,so it’s necessary to take obligation seriously further.

关 键 词：义务 权利 制裁 应当 法学话语 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]